Planning bid to convert Church Langley house into children’s home set to go before committee
News / Mon 10th Feb 2025 at 06:59am
A PLANNING application to convert a house in Church Langley into a care home is set to be put before the Harlow Council planning committee.

Recommendation
The proposal seeks permission for the change of use from single dwellinghouse (Class C3) to children’s care home. No external alterations are proposed to the dwelling. The proposed use is found to be acceptable in terms of character and appearance, residential amenity and parking/highways considerations. It complies with the relevant policies within the HLDP and supplementary documents and is recommended for approval accordingly.
Details of the Proposal
This application seeks full planning permission for the change of use from single dwellinghouse (Class C3) to children’s care home (Class C2). It would facilitate the provision of residential accommodation for a maximum of three residents aged between 8 and 17.
The applicant has set out that there would be seven members of full-time equivalent staff, operating on 12-hour shift pattern arrangements between 7 and 10. There would be a minimum of two staff members at any given time, with one site manager.
No external alterations are proposed to the dwelling.
Site and surroundings
The application site relates to 186 Malin Drive, a mid-terraced townhouse located within a residential area of Church Langley. It shares a boundary to the east with No. 185 and one to the west with No. 187.
Summary of Representations Received
Objections: 37 from 20 separate properties have been received
Support: 20 received
Objections
The following objections were raised that are material to the determination of this planning application:
Parking/Highway Safety: will exacerbate local parking stress; traffic generation; most properties only have one parking space so park on the road
How will staff being encouraged to use public transport be enforced/monitored; Malkin Drive is not served by public transport; there are no parking restrictions; access issues for emergency vehicles and residents; hazard for pedestrians/cyclists
Amenity: noise generation; disturbance; altered street dynamics caused by staff turnover and activity; erosion of sense of local community; loss of privacy
Character & Appearance: conversion into children’s care home not suitable within a residential area; overdevelopment/intensification of property; degradation; estate is a family-oriented development
Officer Comment: The material matters raised are addressed in the assessment below.
Support
The following expressions of support were raised that are material to the determination of this planning application:
– Will give vulnerable children a safe, caring, secure, inclusive and supportive home/environment;
– Provide life and social skills to help support transition to adulthood; educational and emotional support;
– High demand for service; will be a great asset; and
– Located near services and schools..
The application is scheduled to be discussed on Wednesday February 12th at 7pm in the Civic Offices.
The full application can be found here
I notice use of parking as an objection, but the planning application states "There would be a minimum of two staff members at any given time." So, just an excuse to avoid exposing their true lack of compassion.
David Forman clearly isn't a resident of this area, neither am I. However, I have walked around this area many times and it has to be one of the most congested areas in Harlow. I'm not sure how emergency services can get down the road as it is, without any extra cars. This particular corner is dreadful. It is not a case of NIMBY as I don't live there, but do feel that this is a totally unsuitable location and side with the objections in this case.
Dear Court, I am familiar with Malkin Drive as I delivered Keep Our NHS Public leaflets there last April. I have also dropped leaflets and canvassed there in the past for the Labour Party.
Correction: Keep Our NHS Public leaflets delivered last June in time for the general election on July 4.
Seriously, please don't use emergency vehicles as an excuse for you being worried about the parking issue, when in actual fact there is NO difference as now, a married couple with 2 cars and an eldest child with a car exactly the same as a site manager and possibly 2 members of staffs cars? Not everyone drives these days either I know of 3 carers in the current teenage care home that don't actually drive and 1 car shares 2 get there by bus and their shifts are 7 to 10 or 10 to 7, so no congestion. If playing devil's advocate and the all drive then there's no extra vehicles compared to now. Also of said neighbours stating parking which is a flimsy cover for the real prejudice, will you petition against every neighbour once their eldest children all get to ages of having cars? The plans state no external work so on the face of things you wouldn't be able to tell much difference. As a foster carer I'm appalled having read through the objections which let's face it is about their own property values which won't take a massive hit as externally the street will remain the same, instead of putting the needs of these poor children first? So much for the be kind movement people proclaim to follow now a days. This home is needed, these children need a safe place, I genuinely hope that narrow-minded objectors never need the help of social care on any level because if you needed it and people and their bigot views were the reason you didn't get help, then and only then will you feel 10% of what those children feel and then you'll really see how little help there is out there. Anything can happen to anyone at anytime and the fall from grace is very far....let's hope you get the support you need when it's your turn eh?
Therel be spurious objections because there'll be those prejudiced against the proposed occupants. It was the same years ago when a rehab centre was planned in the town. Despite 'objections' the rehab place went ahead, and of course there weren't any problems.
Maybe nimbys but give the kids a chance in life.
Family development and environment is just what these children need. Safety and security and a loving home. Church Langley is perfect.
I noticed this above "The application is scheduled to be discussed on Wednesday February 12th at 7pm in the Civic Offices." but yet the planning application has already been approved, what's up with that? Look, we'd all like a kumbai yah moment in giving these damaged kids a chance for a better way of life but then reality kicks in. The kids know the system inside out and ask anyone who has lived next too/lives close to one of these homes, crime goes up, drugs in the local area goes up, police suddenly know where that address is and pay regular visits to it. The company often gets bodies to meet the legal requirement but they are the cheapest they could find and have very little experience in transforming these kids. Let me put it in a simple way. If this application was requesting to be next to any of the panel members/councillors/planing department's home's, it would not get approval because they know the living hell these homes cause to it's direct and indirect nieghbours.
Steph, in your comment you mention the ‘be kind’ movement which is incredibly ironic given you’ve been anything but kind. You have already decided that the people objecting - people you don’t know anything about - are narrow-minded, prejudiced and only concerned with their property prices. Maybe you could practice what you preach and be kind? There could be many reasons why people are objecting, and allowing for those reasons to be heard is part of the process. Be careful of the sweeping assumptions you’ve made - there could be some really painful reasons behind the objections.
The audacity of trying to open something like this in a terraced house. The residents pay a lot of money to either own or privately rent houses in an area like Malkin drive and now potentially face misery because some greedy person wants to turn their house into a money printing machine (which is what anything to do with kids in care is). Children's homes should be purpose built structures separate from residential areas. I bet the applicants surname isn't Smith....
11 Comments for Planning bid to convert Church Langley house into children’s home set to go before committee: