Letter to Editor: Teacher responds to newspaper criticism
Education: Secondary / Tue 12th May 2020 at 08:12am
Dear Editor,
I FOUND myself incensed by the headline in the Mail on Sunday this week. Now some might say that’s no surprise for a ‘lefty’ like me. But usually I am quite good at taking what the Mail says with a pinch of salt. My granddad read it for years and it didn’t stop him voting Labour all his life.
However, when the Mail on Sunday’s front page claim that teaching unions are against the reopening of schools because they want ‘extra money’ I saw red. Firstly I find it ironic that certain media publications are suddenly so concerned about children’s education. The idea that not going back for another month, even two, would be so damaging to children whom have been the victim of teacher shortages, shortages that have led to some having a series of supply teachers, sometimes for over a year, is a bit rich.
However, the biggest point to make about this is not a political one, it is one of common sense, and even I appreciate that’s not always the same thing. I teach in a school of around 1200 students. I teach in classes that have up to 32 students in them in a school which was built over 50 years ago. You can’t socially distance if there isn’t the space. Okay so we can make class sizes smaller. The issue is we don’t have enough teachers to do that. The teacher shortage will be made even worse by the fact some teachers themselves maybe ill and some have children themselves who are classed as vulnerable so can’t go in to school. In the two days before schools closed I was 50% of our Maths dept as all the other teachers were ill or self isolating. Although we may be over the peak we are still not at the tail of the curve for new cases of Covid 19.
Then there’s the matter of break time and lunchtime. I heard one story about a head teacher in another school talking about painting white lines on the field marking two metres. Really? Do we think that young people are going to be able to adhere to that even if they try? If you do then you’ve not spent a lot of time with teenagers.
In reality spending an extra two months off school won’t have the dramatically damaging effect that the Mail on Sunday are trying to convince you of, certainly less of an effect than having over a year of supply teachers, some of who won’t even be subject specialists, has had. I care a great deal about education. I wouldn’t have been a teacher for 15 years if I didn’t. I’m currently setting work for students to do online and providing feedback where required, as well as giving lessons to friends students via zoom. But I tend to think that the health and well-being of my students comes first!
Fortunately the Prime Minister has suggested tonight that schools should not open until June at the earliest. I hope that any return is as soon as possible after that date, but only if it can be done in a way that is safe for pupils, safe for the families of pupils that may carry the virus home, even if they are asymptotic, and safe for all the staff of schools.
Chris Vince
Chris, i don't disagree with a lot of this and it's refreshing to hear it's not a political point scoring rant at with the benefit of hindsight. Personally I’m a bit sick of the political sniping for the sake of it when in truth nobody really knows what to do next, and the new slogan, it's exactly the same in other countries without all this confusion. However, i do think there is some scientific context needed to your points. The reason schools will reopen is that the death risk in people under 35 is so low. Also, we cannot stop this virus completely until there is a vaccine or most get it. As a teacher look at chickenpox as an example of how the virus works, it's still going round though 95% have had it and it hospitalisaes thousands and kills about 50 children per year. Given we still don't have a vaccine for SARS or MERS 12/13 years later, there's still a chance it could take a while. So while those who are not at high risk are less likely to put a burden on the NHS and those who are at risk are still isolating it does make sense to let them return to normal activity so if the virus does spread then it won't impact the NHS as much. This isn't complete herd immunity (which was badly described and called for at the start wrongly) as it still involves a large chunk of society being kept away until the virus stops replicating as much as there are fewer people for it to replicate too. Now that is risky as we don't know if someone who's had it already can still pass it on again, but we can't stay at home forever. But it's a good bet. And to those who say leave it until September, well problem is, nothing much will change as the virus will still be out there as the r rate will not drop to 0 and there won't be a vaccine, so it'll just come back stronger and affect more people at once, which then puts pressure back on the NHS. It's just kicking the problem down the road, when actually we have a unique opportunity now to at least stop the r rate from rising too much, but returning to normal activity, and helping to limit the future spread by ensuring those now don't overwhelm the NHS at once. It's a tough message but yes, some people will need hospital treatment, but without vaccination and now the virus is here we can do absolutely nothing to stop that while we still use supermarkets etc. it will continue to spread whatever we do. That does leave teachers at risk though, and those concerns should be managed before June. The only thing that can be done is an exceptionally good swab testing and antibody testing regime. If they don't have it then clear to return, if they do then isolate, if had it in the past then there’s a lower risk and this will reduce absenteeism. We need to know the risks to them and quickly so that there are not complications with people who work in this profession and they are not put at an unnecessary risk. That's what you should be calling for and pressing upon this government to ensure. Don't get blinded by the politics or the immediate actions, look at the science behind it and then you'll get to what really needs to happen. And to be fair, some of what should be happening isn't, but it's getting drowned out by points that make no difference like slogans and the govt can't be held to account on what is right to fix and berate them for. Remember all this is about now is limiting the virus spread to anyone who can get really ill from it and giving us all a fighting chance. The opportunity to stop it is long gone, it's here and we have to make do. Hiding away for the next two years is not a solution.
Dear jhumphreys84 thank you as always for a really positive and constructive response to my letter. It's always nice when people engage positively and the appreciation I am not trying to political point score. My main issue with the letter in the Mail was this fallacy that unions were using this crisis to demand a pay rise for teachers. Whatever, we think about how much teachers earn, in this instance teaching unions were concerned about the well fare of their members which is what they should be doing. I would still be deeply worried about any schools going back until I felt confident that teachers, support staff and students (particularly those with family members who are more vulnerable) were safe to do so. Again I'd love to chat to you more about politics in general but sadly we might have to wait on that front. All the best to you and your family during this troubling time.
Drone on and drone on. A mutual back patting society here. The teaching unions are up to mischief , it cannot be denied, nor can the 80% salary they're taking, paid for by the tax payers, like me.
3 Comments for Letter to Editor: Teacher responds to newspaper criticism: