XII I II III IIII V VI VII VIII IX X XI

Upstream: Rivers polluted beyond legal levels

News / Thu 21st Apr 2022 at 05:54pm

AN Essex council will ask the Government for more river inspections after councillors took it upon themselves to test pollution levels – finding them to be “beyond legal limits”.

Uttlesford District councillors Richard Pavitt and Judy Emmanuel said pollution in the River Cam and River Chelmer was likely to be from raw or partially treated sewage.

Concerns were raised over children playing in the rivers, especially during the warm summer months and on the threat to local wildlife.

Other councillors claimed private water companies were not monitoring the pollution levels themselves.

The district council will now write to the Environment Secretary George Eustice to ask for more funding for the Environment Agency, with the view to increase inspections of rivers, water recycling centres and the performance of water companies in Uttlesford.

Introducing the cross-party motion at a meeting last night (April 24), Cllr Pavitt  (Uttlesford Independents, Littlebury, Chesterford & Wenden Lofts) said: “Sample testing and visual reports indicate that these rivers are polluted beyond legal limits. 

“Local authorities need support to protect public health and river ecology.”

The River Cam starts just south of the town of Newport and there is a sewage treatment works nearby in Water Lane.

Cllr Emmanuel (Residents for Uttlesford, Newport) said: “Richard and I went and tested the water quality south of the sewage treatment works and the water quality was good.

“We then went above the sewage treatment works and the figures were off the scale”.

Supporters of the motion also suggested other rivers passing through the district, such as the River Chelmer and Stebbing Brook, were similarly contaminated.

Councillor Christian Criscione (Con, Flitch Green and Little Dunmow) said pollution was not always visible, heightening the risk to those using the waters.

He said: “What they do not realise is, largely they cannot see the damage that they’re doing to themselves in the river then. You can’t see it with the naked eye.”

He continued to say the levels of contaminants were not being monitored by water companies.

Cllr Criscione said: “We need to know what we’re dealing with and we need to have the evidence to back up the need to enforce.”

According to council documents, Uttlesford is the watershed of three major river catchments.

These are Great Ouse, which includes the River Cam, Thames, which includes the River Roding and River Stort, and North Essex, which includes the River Chelmer and Stebbing Brook.

A copy of the letter will also be sent to local MP Kemi Badenoch (Con, Saffron Walden).

4 Comments for Upstream: Rivers polluted beyond legal levels:

Edward
2022-04-21 21:48:11

So are most rivers in the UK See reports by The Rivers Trust. https://theriverstrust.org/about-us/news/press-release-sewage-pollution-the-crappiest-map This includes the River Stort, a chalk stream. Chalk streams are precious special ecological habitats: all are rated as unique streams and , are in the UK and all are polluted. This is one of the reasons Friends of Latton Island group are and have protested against the Eastern Crossing that is a raised road across the River Valley that will bisect the flood plain and damage the ecology of the whole Valley.

Kim Oconnor
2022-04-22 08:51:29

Well said Edward as usual. Spot on.

TJ
2022-04-22 12:58:11

BREXIT - TAKING BACK CONTROL! Since 2010 our Tory governments have progressively cut legislation on pollution. From now on, there is every indication that government will introduce damaging policies with little fear of official comeback and companies are more or less free to abuse the environment. Uttlesford District can of course ask the Government for more river inspections but I suspect nobody is going to listen. The environmental audit committee reported that a “chemical cocktail” of raw sewage and slurry was polluting many of England’s rivers. According to watchdog group Unchecked UK, between 2011 and 2016, the agency’s protection budget fell by 62% and staff numbers were cut by nearly a quarter. Prosecutions fell by 80%, the number of pollution incidents logged dropped 29% and water samples taken by the EA fell by 28%. Be careful what you vote for...

Kim Oconnor
2022-04-22 19:32:02

God can you imagine the smell, because theses developers love to build on the rivers.

Leave a Comment Below:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *