Essex Police purchase Live Facial Recognition technology
Crime / Sat 17th Aug 2024 at 08:14am
LIVE Facial Recognition is an investment in our communities and will help keep people safe”.
A spokesperson said: “That’s from one of our top officers as we announce the first deployment of our new Live Facial Recognition (LFR) technology.

“We trialled the technology in October last year, borrowing equipment from South Wales Police.
Across two days – one where it was deployed in Southend and another where it was in Chelmsford – it resulted in five positive alerts and three arrests, including for rape and robbery.
“Following this successful trial, we have now, supported by funding from the Police, Fire, and Crime Commissioner for Essex, purchased our own equipment and it will be first deployed at the Clacton Airshow on Thursday 22 and Friday 23 August.
“We will be deploying elsewhere in the county in the future and will tell the public in a reasonable period before the deployment.
Assistant Chief Constable Andy Pritchard said: “We’re an innovative and forward-thinking force, utilising new technology to keep people safe and deter crime.
“Cutting edge technology is playing an important role in protecting people, responding to and investigating crimes, and getting justice for victims.
“Our Live Facial Recognition technology will be used to locate people we want to speak to in connection with ongoing investigations and to manage people with court orders or conditions.
“Criminals cannot think they can walk around our communities without being caught and our successful trial last year showed LFR is an effective way of locating people.
“Our first deployment at the Clacton Airshow is a really exciting moment for the force.
“We’re deploying there to ensure you’re safe if you’re planning to go to the airshow.
“We want you and your family to enjoy the airshow and using LFR will help keep you safe and have a good day.
“We’re looking for specific people wanted for serious offences and to enforce orders so ordinary members of the public should have no concerns about the vans being there.
“If you are going to the airshow and see our officers who are operating the vans, please come and say hello and ask questions about the technology.”
ACC Pritchard said this technology is an investment in our communities: “It’s an effective way of finding people we want to speak to and keeping the public safe.
“Using LFR to find someone can be a more efficient use of resources than a team of officers carrying out various time-consuming enquiries to locate them.
“This technology can save time our officers, leaving them able to focus on additional force priorities to protect and help the public, and further investigations.”
LFR is targeted to focus on people on specific people we’re trying to locate.
ACC Pritchard said: “We take people’s privacy really seriously.
“The technology utilises CCTV camera feeds to LFR software to scan faces against a predetermined database or ‘watch list’ of people of interest.
“The scanning of an image takes less than a second and image of anyone not on the watchlist is automatically and immediately deleted and not stored.
“When there is a positive match, appropriate action will be taken by officers on the ground to confirm ID and then assess what the next action is to be taken.”
The force already uses similar technology to identify suspects with great effect.
ACC Pritchard said: “We already use retrospective facial recognition technology and have had some good success with it.
“This is basically where we have a CCTV or doorbell image of a suspect and run it through police databases.
“The facial recognition technology then tells us if there’s a match between the image and someone on the database.
“Between May and June we used this technology to help identify almost 80 suspects this way and it really helps move investigations forward.”
Jane Gardner, Deputy Police, Fire and Crime Commissioner for Essex, said: “The PFCC is supportive of LFR in so far Essex Police use it for its intended purpose of identifying people wanted for arrest and so take them off the streets in a way which is effective and accurate.
“We want to reassure Essex people that the PFCC will continue to scrutinise use of LFR to make sure it is used proportionately and fairly.”
You can read more about Live Facial Recognition on our website:
Why tell the public in advance of its use?,does that not alert the people you are seeking the time to think..I will not go to the area.
Won’t be long until you will need written permission to leave your house I suspect. If we had police on the streets you would not need all this tech.
Ah yes, one step closer to social credit scores. Write bad words online that's it, no more food for you, call out the government? Wish your healthcare goodbye.
Totally happy with something which makes our streets and homes safer. Seems to me the only people who need to be concerned are law breakers
Agree Pete. 👍🏻
wonderful another step towards an Orwellian state. Pete - trading freedom for safety is always a bad idea, it will be a slippery slope. I will take dangerous freedom over totalitarian safety every day of the week
Adam, i totally disagree, I would much prefer a society where wrong doers are caught and iaw abiding citizens can go about their business in peace and safety. Should I presume that you disagree with the recent rioters being found guilty because their actions were filmed?
I wonder how many false positives it throws up.
Is it good bye to cash now? Is it fingerprint I.D or retina I.D to enter ANYWHERE? Should we all be wearing tin hats? Is this a country of democracy or are we heading for a communist state?
Funny how they are wheeling that out in Clacton!?! Which enemy of the state and associated supporters hang out in that neck of the woods?
Peter - No I agree the recent rioters deserved everything they get. This however is different this is monitoring people walking down the street akin to communist china. The issue is what is law abiding today might not be tomorrow, I would rather we did not give government the tools to turn the UK into a large prison like China.
Adam, I am pleased with your comment re rioters. I doubt I will be alive to see an authoritarian state. I take your point although spreading disi-nformation as we saw before the riots seems a bigger danger, especially when leading figures like Donald Trump seem to expouse it.
I'd like some of the figures that have been deliberately left out. Population of Chelmsford (2021 census) 181,500. Population of Southend (2021 census) 182,287. Now if you have tracked and followed over 360,000 people whose images you hold onto for a rolling continual period of 31 days and it only picked out 3 people who were arrested, that is a success rate of= 0.0008246583852639% . I'd like to know how much the system cost, as any system with such a low success rate, should be refused any spend till it reaches a far better success rate. I'm also interested in the cost as I wonder if a better spend could be more bobbies on the beat?
In July 2019 the House of Commons Science and Technology select committee had this to say about Liverpool Facial Recognition: "We reiterate our recommendation from our 2018 Report that automatic facial recognition should not be deployed until concerns over the technology’s effectiveness and potential bias have been fully resolved. We call on the Government to issue a moratorium on the current use of facial recognition technology and no further trials should take place until a legislative framework has been introduced and guidance on trial protocols, and an oversight and evaluation system, has been established." See paragraph 37 on page 16 of https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201719/cmselect/cmsctech/1970/1970.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwjYv9-luYWIAxXYVEEAHfl4GAkQFnoECBIQAQ&usg=AOvVaw0NdpWZmY4JZxZrERJJFu1A
In January this year the House of Lords Justice and Home Affairs Committee wrote to the Home Secretary detailing their concerns about Live Facial Recognition: "There is no legislative basis that creates the police powers for the use of LFR. There is no primary or secondary legislation which mentions facial recognition, and the technology has never been debated in the House of Commons. The most detailed parliamentary examination of LFR, undertaken by the Science and Technology Committee in 2019, called for a stop to its use, citing concerns over the lack of legal framework." So, the Government ignored the report of a parliamentary committee in 2019 to create a legal framework, safeguards and oversight. Why avoid perfectly sensible recommendations? We especially should worry when the police create their own watchlists and we have only the word of the police for the number of false positives! See annexe paragraph 2 of letter at https://committees.parliament.uk/publications/43080/documents/214371/default/
Big Brother Watch evidence to the House of Lords committee revealed an Essex University study into Live Facial Recognition (LFR) in 2023. Their study of the Met Police LFR trials revealed: "The report noted a flawed approach to planning and methodology, a failure by the Met to engage with the concept of ‘necessity’ and a failure to establish consent. Numerous operational failures including inconsistencies in the process used to verify matches and a presumption to intervene were also found. Alerts issued by the technology were verifiably accurate in less than 20% of cases, suggesting significant unnecessary stops, with social and legal consequences." See Essex Uni report at https://www.essex.ac.uk/research/showcase/report-on-the-police-use-of-facial-recognition-technology-identifies-significant-concerns
Correction Essex Uni research was July 2019 and here is the Guardian report on it: https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2019/jul/03/police-face-calls-to-end-use-of-facial-recognition-software
17 Comments for Essex Police purchase Live Facial Recognition technology: