Kay’s Blog: How can we get more people in Harlow to vote?
Politics / Sun 18th May 2025 at 06:27am

THE Mark Hall by-election brought a result predicted by some wise ones. The turnout was 27.9%. Yes, 27.9%. Let’s call it 28% That means 72% of Mark Hall voters didn’t participate. Many have tried to analyse the reasons for that: a lack of faith in the system generally, no confidence in political parties, a sense of powerlessness, a feeling that the result will change nothing. All of those explanations point to disillusion and, maybe, cynicism. If most of those non-voters had voted, the result could have been different.
I wonder if we prepare our young people sufficiently for their role as voters. Well, Citizenship is taught in our schools. Its effects are claimed to be more tolerant citizens, more supportive of democracy and confident in their ability to participate in civic life. Students who benefit from Citizenship teaching develop knowledge, skills, confidence and the inclination to participate fully in our democratic systems, it seems. Maybe they’ll be inclined to vote.
Did you know that Australia has one of the highest voter turnouts in the world? There, compulsory voting (supported by the majority of the population) surged to 91% in 1925 and has stayed high since then. Australia believes its election results accurately reflect the will of the electorate; maybe it’s time for the UK to change our expectations of the voter.
Recent events commemorating VE Day reminded me of the selflessness of so many who made so many sacrifices in so many ways for the sake of their country and of their country’s people. We owe them; we’ll always be in their debt. Their patriotism protected all of us.
Voting may be a patriotic act, too. To explore the idea, I nerdily checked the definition ….. Patriotism represents concern for the country’s wellbeing and a love of the country as a whole, including all who live in it. It means a willingness to sacrifice for the good of that country, exemplified in being a good citizen, a public servant, a volunteer and in acts of kindness, respect for fellow citizens.
Is it the same as nationalism? No! The strength of my response reflects my background and experience; for me, the difference is stark. In fact, nationalism/republicanism makes my skin crawl. Put simply, it means being interested in one group of people over all others, seeing one country as superior to others.
Let’s foster the best kind of patriotism. Let’s review our electoral system to inculcate better participation and representation. Let’s hear from more citizens. More power to the people, without the flag-waving. Please.
Can you explain why you didn't stand for the parliamentary election, as a socialist, against Mr Vince? I suspect you would have walked it and be a serious, pragmatic and proactive MP for Harlow. The Mark Hall result just identified the lack of faith and trust in politicians who say one thing and do another. And I suspect you would have challenged the decisions to cut PIP, fuel payments to pensioners, and the two child rule. We need substance, integrity and clear values in MP' and you would have done that. Now the opportunity has gone and the lighter shade of blue Labour party will regret that come the next election. The young, old, ill and disabled have been shafted and will sit on their hands next year with an even lower turnout in this town and in the country. Anyone got a spare ticket to Vancouver come October?!
Research has been done that shows people get disillusioned in voting because of politicians behaving badly. We have plenty of examples in the current Labour government such as free clothes, free theatre tickets and free best seats at sporting events. Every normal person knows there is always a return required on 'free' gear. Then there is the Labour MP in Runcorn punching the daylights out of a constituent. Add to that the expenses scandal which keeps bubbling away. This gives the public the idea that politicians are there to line their pockets which is not the case for many entering politics. However, I do share Kay Morrison's dislike of nationalism. Unfortunately to combat it requires an alternative that delivers for working people. This current government is only delivering for its corporate donors and I suspect some of them are having buyers' remorse.
It seems these days that if you are out of touch with the electorate, then the conventional parties label you a nationalist or far right, which is the same idiocy as using the term racist just to shut others down. In any other industry other than politics, if one group was the market leader, others would seek to raise their game but in politics they seek to remove the popular vote to keep standards low and apathy high. Politicians have demeaned their own trade causing the apathy around them and they have no one to blame but themselves. How do we change it? Seperate the wheat from the chaffe and start looking for people who ask what can I do for my community instead of what we have now, what can I get out of my community? at both national and local level. Alice Walker once said " The most common way people give up their power is by thinking they don't have any"
Simple stop taking us for fools Kim.
Maybe if you politicians actually done what you were voted in to do or actually improved things instead of adding bureaucracy upon bureaucracy and making things worse then maybe just maybe people might actually come out to vote. But if all people ever get is crap then why bother.
People stop voting for two reasons. One they don’t feel there is much choice between candidates or they feel disenfranchised by politicians not representing the electorate. Nowadays we seem to live in a semi dictatorship and it’s been like this for quite some time, so it is not surprising people are not voting.
Democracy...Has anyone got 45k plus spare change for an electric car and heat pump at all? Just as these are on their way to being mandated, spending everyone's money for them.
Easy make it mandatory to vote for everyone and then include a box on the voting form "none of the above".Any politician that gets outvoted by that box has to resign simple.Also in line with the mandate that unions need to secure industrial action 50% of the electorate must have voted and anything less then the election should be null and void.These parties getting to local and central government on a turnout of 30% is plain ridiculous.Of course if it were a legal requirement to vote those percentages of people of voting age should be 100%.Those people that do not vote or cannot be bothered then do not moan when political decisions start affecting you.
Not surprised the electorate is not prepared to go out and vote. It’s because there are to many so called politicians, who blatantly lie to your face, and do the complete opposite of what they say they will do, when they get elected. Democracy as the British people know, used to be trusted. Not anymore, the two major parties have become mirror images of each other, they have destroyed, what democracy we had, nobody who would want to do the right thing by the electorate, will ever be allowed to be selected by the party hierarchy, if it clashes with the party line, which means the party leaders themselves have caused the destruction of true democracy, the party leader is the one with the bell round the neck, that the politicians follow. Until we the people of this Country actually go out and vote against this two tier party system, nothing will change, and politicians know it. If things don’t change they stay as they are, it’s electorate apathy that will cause it to stay the same.
You are right Kay, election turnout is far too low. When I've been out campaigning for elections and ask those who say they won't vote why they won't, the most frequent response is along the lines of, 'Because you're all the same, you lie about what you will do when you want to be elected, but once elected, you don't do what you promised and you don't listen to the people. Don't trust any of you.' In too many cases, of course, those who won't vote are right to hold this view, but in other cases they're not, many councillors work very hard to try to keep their promises and to work for the people of their ward and the town, not themselves. How could we encourage the electorate to vote? In my opinion, by frequently consulting with the public - and listening to what they have to say - that would help. The proof that this works, in my opinion was EU Referendum of 2016, which was preceded there was a unique, extensive consultation exercise. Partly as a result of that: 72.2% of the UK electorate turned out to vote. 16,141,241 people (48.1% of all voters) voted to remain a member of the European Union. 17,410,742 people (51.9% of all voters) voted to leave the European Union. There were 25,359 rejected ballot papers. Harlow turnout was 73.5%, thanks to 29,602 votes (68.1%) for Leave and 13867 31.9% votes for remain. Afterwards, too many MPs of all parties paid lip service to respecting the people's vote, yet then did their utmost to undermine that choice and to force a second Referendum. Now, the Prime Minister is ignoring the need for a Referendum on major constitutional issues, like EU membership, and is dragging the people of UK back into membership of the EU by stealth. Little wonder so many people don't vote, Kay.
The reasons given by Kay and Colleen and others are the fault of the Parties they represent. You do not have to look far to see why residents do not trust or believe local polititians, let alone those at Westminister anymore. Just look at how residents in Bushy Croft were ignored and misled when the council decided to build on allotment land, same goes for those at Bynghams and the building of a wharehouse within feet of their home, the 6000 people who objected to the Stort river crossing, the misleading actions in respect of Sherards House. The outcome is millions of people turning to Reform when the time comes to vote, something which councillors in Essex denied us earlier this month.
Warehouse
And yet, David Foreman, none of which is as bad as 14 years of tory when it came to taking the micky and sadly I didn't see you address those.. The British press just report more when it is Labour. However, ALL parties should not get freebies and their donors must have no contracts in any shape or form with governments imo. And yes, there goes a flying pig!
You only have to look at Starmers Brexit betrayal to see what politicians think of democratic votes and why politicians from local to national are not trusted by the electorate.
When you look at the poor quality of politicians both nationally and local you can understand why voters are disinterested, they seem to have lost the premise of "elected by the people to Serve the people"
First Reason. Bringing in the rule of needing ID to vote. Second Reason. All parties are a bunch of liars and promise everything a give nothing, especially Chris Vince. He has been an MP for less than a year, and is the worst we have ever had. He will never go against his God Starmer.
I always vote,even though I don't trust any of them ,I support the least worst on offer.When people don't vote you end up like the UK is right now,drifting and going downhill rapidly.
I believe that to get more people to vote in this town and country. You should stop picking on the vulnerable.Have free education at the point of service. Give us a decent hospital. Do something about the internal roads out ser Ives. Give our workers better conditions. Build more council houses with affordable rents and decent repair programs for our existing ones.with accountability for work not being done. Not everything can be achieved by computers.So it stands to reason that we have actual people working symbiotically Do you know it is actually faster getting served in shops if people have cash. I prefer shop assistants.And bank clerks. If you have a question it is always preferable to speak to a human. Also,as I have experienced alot. When computer software breaks down the shops always say Cash only. It is also very costly to keep servicing them.
18 Comments for Kay’s Blog: How can we get more people in Harlow to vote?: