XII I II III IIII V VI VII VIII IX X XI

Over the border: What are the proposals for local government re-organisation in Hertfordshire?

Politics / Fri 14th Nov 2025 at 10:02am

AS part of the move towards local government re-organisation, Hertfordshire’s two-tier system of a county council and 10 district and borough councils is expected to be replaced with a smaller number of unitary authorities by 2028 reports the Local Democracy Reporter.

And in recent months, leaders of Hertfordshire’s existing 11 councils have been looking at a number of unitary options for the future.

Last week, the leaders agreed on a draft joint submission to the Government that outlines three different options – that would see existing councils be replaced with two, three or four unitary authorities.

But before the document is submitted to the Government, each of the county’s 11 councils will have to determine which of the three options they support.

Ultimately, it will be the Government that determines which of the councils’ options to take forward – or whether to respond with an option of their own.

Here is a brief summary of each of the three options.

TWO UNITARY AUTHORITY OPTION


Under the first option, the county would be split into two unitary authorities – East and West.

In the East would be areas currently covered by Broxbourne, East Herts, North Herts, Stevenage and Welwyn Hatfield councils. In the West would be Dacorum, Hertsmere, St Albans, Three Rivers and Watford.

Each authority would serve a population of around 600,000, with a total of 234 councillors across the two authorities.

Estimates suggest the change could cut local government costs by around £50m a year, with estimated cumulative savings of between £366m and £418m in the first 10 years.

THREE UNITARY AUTHORITY OPTION


An alternative in the councils’ draft submission would be to split the county into three unitary authorities – East, West and Central.

Under this option, the East would include areas currently covered by Broxbourne, East Herts, North Herts and Stevenage councils.

The West would include areas currently covered by Dacorum, Three Rivers and Watford, as well as the Bushey North and Bushey South county council divisions.

And the Central authority would include areas currently covered by Hertsmere, St Albans and Welwyn Hatfield, without the county council divisions of Bushey North and Bushey South.

Populations in each of these three authorities would range between 350,000 and 480,000. And there would be 234 councillors overall.

Estimates suggest the three authority model could cut costs by between £181m and £258m in the first 10 years.

FOUR UNITARY AUTHORITY OPTION

In addition, the councils’ draft document includes proposals for the county to be split into four unitary authorities – West, South-West, Central and East.

The West would include areas currently covered by Dacorum and St Albans councils.

The South West would include areas currently covered by Hertsmere, Three Rivers and Watford councils.

Central would include the bulk of the existing North Herts and Welwyn Hatfield councils, as well as Stevenage.

And East would include areas currently covered by Broxbourne and East Herts councils, as well as the current North Herts wards of Arbury, Ermine, Royston Heath, Royston Meridian, Royston Palace and Weston and Sandon and the existing Welwyn Hatfield ward of Northaw and Cuffley.

Populations in these four unitary authorities would vary between 290,000 and 320,000. And, according to the proposal, there would be 327 councillors.

Estimates suggest that it could save £124m over the first 10 years.

4 Comments for Over the border: What are the proposals for local government re-organisation in Hertfordshire?:

Big Pop
2025-11-14 22:46:17

For the love of God!! Go for option 3 so that St Albans is no longer in the mix with Dacorum. Hemel is a right scrubby hole full of tinkers and trouble makers. Let's get St Albans disassociated with Hemel

Loz
2025-11-14 22:52:12

The three authority map is the only one that really makes sense, the others create some crude and disadvantageous divisions and combinations of areas

Loz
2025-11-14 23:04:09

To Big Pop - option 3 is the four authority map that keeps St Albans and Dacorum (Hemel) together! Did you mean option 2, the three authority map? That's the only one that splits St Albans and Hemel Hemel isn't so bad nowadays anyway, way better than it used to be at least and lots going for it

Nicholas Taylor
2025-11-15 10:14:18

Despite the thousands of hours spent on this "project", the financial assumptions could be made on the back of a fag packet as is the case with the Essex reorganisation. Each proposal says the other ones are not credible and in the meantime Councillors are failing to deal with the real issues facing local government. When I asked Cllr Swords how much it would cost to set up and service Area Committees, he had no idea, so it is clear that so called savings have no credible evidence. Apart from Labour and the Conservatives, every other political Party does not support these changes. By ignoring public opinion (again) both Parties will fall to others when elections next take place. Nicholas Taylor, Leader of Harlow Residents Alliance.

Leave a Comment Below:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *