Essex County Council leader accused of “misjudging crime priorities”

Crime / Sat 18th May 2019 pm31 05:11pm

By Local Democracy Reporter
Steve Shaw

THE leader of Essex County Council has been accused of misjudging crime priorities by failing to stand up for the county in the face of police cuts, despite pledging £500,000 of council money to fight county line drugs gangs.

David Finch repeated council action to offer £500,000 of extra funding to help police tackle so-called county lines drugs in Full Council yesterday.

But the move was decried as trivial given the scale of cuts the force has faced – it lost 400 officers between 2011 and last year.

And although those numbers are increasing again – 150 new police officer were recruited last year and another 215 will be over the next year – Lib Dem Barry Aspinell councillor said Cllr Finch should have spoken out more at the time.

He said: “In February you gave us the spiel about this being the best this council or any administration has ever put forward in this great county of ours.

“And now you are crowing about putting money into helping the police and crime commissioner look after some of the problems we have got in Essex.

“Where were you when the previous police and crime commissioner closed dozens of police stations around Essex and sacked hundreds of police officers, leading to this rise in crime?

“We have young people in Essex being knifed to death. We have drugs running rife throughout the county.

“And you are telling us you are putting £500,000 to fight that.

“We needed you when it was needed to stand up for us and our community to stop the Conservative crime commissioner move to reduce the effectiveness of crime prevention in Essex.”

On tackling the scourge of county lines gangs, the first Violence and Vulnerability Round Table took place on May 10.

This forum is the first of a series of multi-agency meetings which bring together the police, youth offending services, public health, and local government to create a partnership approach to dealing with all violent crime in Essex.

ECC says the funding will help the partnership to undertake early identification, referral and support of those at risk, to provide education, myth busting, skills and qualifications to vulnerable young people so they are less likely to become involved in gang activity, and to undertake disruption activity to create the conditions in which gang activity cannot thrive.

Cllr Finch said: “The decision made in terms of the force and distribution of the force and efficiency of the force is a matter for the police and crime commissioner.

“Let me be clear, in putting forward the £500,000. I didn’t do that for the benefit of the police force, I did that for the benefit of residents of Essex.

“Those are the people who are suffering with crime and those are the people who are suffering from the issues of drug peddling.

“It would be remiss of me and my cabinet to ignore those issues.

“Where there is the opportunity to find funding it is the right thing to do.”

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

2 Comments for Essex County Council leader accused of “misjudging crime priorities”:

2019-05-21 12:17:41

The Lib Dem councillor accusing David Finch of "mis-judgement", is far removed from reality. Is he expecting that the councillor consults a crystal ball for information ? Same old story, plenty of vitriol, just like Laura M, but nothing of substance to help alleviate the problems.

2019-05-22 17:58:58

Hey Mickey! Does it need a crystal ball to figure out if the police service is reduced, that police stations are closed and there are hundreds fewer coppers about, that crime will rise? I don't think the number of criminals and their activity reduced in parallel with the cuts in funding from central government and approved by the ECC. £500,000 is equal to: 3.57% of a Chris Grayling Ferry Contract (No Ferries) 1.00% of a Chris Grayling Ferry Contract (With Ferries) 1.52% of a Chris Grayling Ferry Contract Settlement with Eurostar I know which I would have liked my income tax/VAT etc going to.

Leave a Comment Below:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *