Statues to get protection from ‘baying mobs’
News / Sun 17th Jan 2021 at 09:50am
THE government is planning new laws to protect statues in England from being removed “on a whim or at the behest of a baying mob”, Communities Secretary Robert Jenrick has said.

Writing in the Sunday Telegraph, he said generations-old monuments should be “considered thoughtfully”.
The legislation would require planning permission for any changes and a minister would be given the final veto.
The plans follow the toppling of a statue of slave trader Edward Colston last year and a wider discussion on the removal of controversial monuments.
Four people were later charged over the removal of the Colston statue, and six people accepted conditional cautions over their involvement.
In the paper, the communities secretary said Britain should not try to edit or censor its past.
Mr Jenrick said any decision to remove heritage assets in England would require planning permission and a consultation with local communities, adding that he wanted to see a “considered approach”.
He wrote: “Our view will be set out in law, that such monuments are almost always best explained and contextualised, not taken and hidden away.”
Mr Jenrick added that he had noticed an attempt to set a narrative which seeks to erase part of the nation’s history, saying this was “at the hand of the flash mob, or by the decree of a ‘cultural committee’ of town hall militants and woke worthies”.
He said: “We live in a country that believes in the rule of law, but when it comes to protecting our heritage, due process has been overridden. That can’t be right.
“Local people should have the chance to be consulted whether a monument should stand or not.
“What has stood for generations should be considered thoughtfully, not removed on a whim or at the behest of a baying mob.”
The death of George Floyd while in the custody of police in Minneapolis sparked anti-racism protests across the world.
During largely peaceful demonstrations in the UK, the controversial Colston statue was dumped into Bristol Harbour and a memorial to Sir Winston Churchill was vandalised with the words “is a racist”.
Speaking in June, Prime Minister Boris Johnson said: “The statue of Winston Churchill in Parliament Square is a permanent reminder of his achievement in saving this country – and the whole of Europe – from a fascist and racist tyranny.
“It is absurd and shameful that this national monument should … be at risk of attack by violent protesters.
“Yes, he sometimes expressed opinions that were and are unacceptable to us today, but he was a hero, and he fully deserves his memorial.”
Yet again the Tories are jumping on the right wing band wagon with incendiary language to refer to anyone who objects and protests about statues to historical slave drivers/owners or wishes to try and encourage a proper debate about Britain's colonial legacy. Mr Jenrick (of coronovirus breaking trips to Wales) calls protesters,baying mobs. His so-called objections about intolerance actually reveal him to be the one who would wish to stifle debate, rewrite our history and provoke people to engage in culture wars and divide our nation. Don't allow bigots to poison your minds. See these people for who they really are.
By the way. Why on earth use a photo of the sculpture "Flight" to accompany this article? Could it be to misinform the Harlow public that if we're not careful, this is the sort of statue that would be obliterated by the baying mobs? Come on now. What's happening to journalism?
Whether some of UK's historic statues or buildings should be demolished is too important a decision to be made by a small 'Woke' minority. The essence of democracy is government by consent, so let the people decide. By 'the people', I don't mean politicians or self interested focus groups: everyone on the electoral register, perhaps on a town by town basis, should vote on a list of statues and other local or national built heritage. But - the list of statues (and heritage buildings) to be voted on should be fully inclusive. It should include all Roman, Norman and subsequent statues and structures, because the multicultural Romans and Normans were empires whose vast wealth was built on slavery: they enslaved Britons for many centuries. The list should also include the memorial to Karl Marx, beloved by the Wokes, who is well documented to have been such a vile racist (and sexist) that his appalling comments on race can't be quoted here. Google it. This great advocate of equality for all is also well documented to have had servants, one of whom he made pregnant. I personally would vote to keep all of our heritage, but with plaques added, setting out the full history of every piece. The plaque added to Winston Churchill's statue would state that he was a great hero, whose leadership saved the people of UK from invasion and enslavement by the evil Nazis - and the people of UK voted the greatest Briton who ever lived. Churchill, however, was a racist who took racist actions as a young politician in the 1890s. Churchill's and Karl Marx's plaque would state that they were Victorians who, as young men, held the racist and sexist views of their time, but what else should we expect from people respectively born in the 1840s and 1870s, prior to the enlightenment of modern universal education? And why confine the vote to statues and buildings? Let's make this town wide votes on our green spaces and proposed developments and send our politicians a resounding message that they will never forget.
3 Comments for Statues to get protection from ‘baying mobs’: