Date for Stort River Crossing planning application announced
News / Tue 8th Feb 2022 at 02:10pm

THE DATES have been announced for the two planning meetings to consider the crossing over the River Stort.
Here are the full details:
APPLICATION: (East Herts ref) 3/19/1046/FUL (Harlow ref) HW/CRB/19/00220
PROPOSAL: Alterations to the existing Fifth Avenue road/rail bridge, and creation of
new bridges to support the widened highway to west of the existing structure to create the Central Stort Crossing, including embankment works, pedestrian and cycle facilities, a pedestrian and cycle bridge over Eastwick Road, lighting and landscaping works and other associated Works
AT: Land Adj To Fifth Avenue Existing Eastwick Crossing Hertfordshire/Harlow
APPLICATION: (East Herts ref) 3/19/1051/FUL (Harlow ref) HW/CRB/19/00221
PROPOSAL: Erection of a new road, pedestrian and cycle bridge; replacement of an existing rail bridge at River Way; alterations to the existing local highway network; lighting and landscaping works; listed building works to Fiddlers Brook Bridge and other associated works.
AT: Land to the south and east of Gilston Village and crossing the River Stort to north of River Way; Gilston, Hertfordshire and Harlow
APPLICATION: (East Herts ref) 3/19/1049/LBC
PROPOSAL: Repair works and replacement white post and 3-rail balustrade to bridge.
AT: Fiddlers Brook Bridge, Gilston
The arrangements are as follows:
East Herts Development Management Committee – 22nd February 2022, commencing at 5.30pm and being held at The Council Chamber, Wallfields, Pegs Lane, Hertford, SG13 8EQ.
Harlow Development Management Committee – 23rd February 2022, commencing at 7.00pm and being held at The Civic Centre, Water Gardens, Harlow CM20 1WG
Please note that the Listed Building application referred to above (ref 3/19/1049/LBC) is being considered by East Herts Council only.
Both Councils operate public speaking schemes, which allow those who have made representations on the applications, to attend and speak at the Committee.
For the East Herts meeting:
A leaflet explaining the details of the scheme can be viewed on the Councils website using the following link https://www.eastherts.gov.uk/councillors-and-committees/public-speaking-development-management-meetings
Please note that in this case, 6 minutes speaking time will be permitted in accordance with the arrangements for strategic sites. If you wish to speak at the committee, you must register your wish in accordance with the timescales set out in the leaflet. Alternatively any comments you wish to make could be passed to your elected member who could make the representations for you.
If you wish to attend the meeting you must follow the current Government Guidance on Covid restrictions and social distancing. Space will be strictly limited so please only attend if you have registered to speak. The meeting will also be live streamed so you can follow it at home, use the link below to find this option. Please also note that, no paper copies of the agenda will be available at the meeting. The agenda can be downloaded from the Councils website before the meeting at
http://democracy.eastherts.gov.uk/ieListDocuments.aspx?CId=118&MId=4022&Ver=4&J=6
For the Harlow meeting:
Details of the public speaking rules are at: https://moderngov.harlow.gov.uk/ieListMeetings.aspx?CommitteeId=289&info=1&MD=Constitution
(Constitution Rules of Procedure Section 19)
Three speakers in favour of the proposal, three speakers objecting to the proposal and the agent or applicant will be allowed to address the Committee prior to the Members’ discussion and decision on the application. Each speaker will be limited to six minutes.
If you wish to speak, you must contact the Corporate and Governance Support Team on 01279 446057 or via e-mail [email protected] and advise them at least 24 hours before the meeting that you wish to speak and the nature of your interest in the proposal.
The available speaking slots will be allocated to those registering first.
If you wish to attend the meeting you must follow the current Government Guidance on Covid restrictions and social distancing. Space will be strictly limited so please only attend if you have registered to speak. Please also note that, no paper copies of the agenda will be available at the meeting. The agenda can be downloaded from the Councils website before the meeting at: Harlow Online www.harlow.gov.uk
If you have made representations on more than one of the above applications, you may receive a second copy of this notification letter.
If you have made representations on more than one of the above applications, you may receive a second copy of this notification letter.
https://www.theguardian.com/society/2022/feb/07/new-greenfield-housing-forcing-people-to-use-cars-report-finds?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=news_tab Time both Labour and Conservative groups realised that what's highlighted in the Guardian is happening here and at the detriment of Harlow. We get all of the disadvantages, more flooding, pollution, congestion and traffic and no housing and the Stort Valley gets trashed. There's other transport options that are greener and can be delivered at a far lower cost. Cllrs will betray the people of Harlow if they vote these plans to build an Eastern Crossing raised road across the Valley.
Before building yet another new road wouldn't it be a better idea to repair the roads we already have, it's an absolute disgrace
If this goes a head, it would an absolute disgrace. It would mean the destruction of our beautiful river, lands and old trees, ripped from there roots, wildlife moved on again.theres no question this river will get polluted. Please leave us the only peaceful beautiful place, its the only peaceful place we have left. It would be unforgivable to damage it.
The report pack to postponed Planning meeting on 27/11/2021 shows High Wych Parish Council opposes the entire HGGT development. The Parish Councils of Hunsdon, Eastwick & Gilston along with the 'Hunsdon, Eastwick and Gilston Neighbourhood Plan Group' oppose the HGGT development on a series of issues. One of their many objections is: "The whole network of new roads (primarily the Eastern Stort Crossing) has no justification and do not demonstrate how they will support the delivery of sustainable transport;". 1753 neighbouring properties were originally consulted. A total of 116 responses were received. Of these, six were neutral, one supports the proposal and 108 object. See paragraphs 10.1 to 11.1 on pages 43 to 45.
I agree David, there is little support for the whole development other than from the developers. Calling the proposed Stort Crossing a SUSTAINABLE TRANSPORT CORRIDOR (STC) is a complete mockery, Adding a path and a cycle track is just a cheep trick, the walking and cycling clubs all agree that the Rivers existing towpath and walking routes in a country setting are preferable to this STC. Where's the Bus lanes? Where's the bus routes? Where are the buses?
My article a few days ago about Councils across Hertfordshire throwing out their own Local Development Plans does not unfortunately include East Herts in which of course these homes to the North of Harlow will be built. News from Kent reports that Councils in that County are also raising objections to the huge numbers of homes the Government has set for the County. These Plans are all about greed on the part of investors and builders and nothing to do with housing need. Neil makes some very good points as usual.
Will be interesting to hear the response of the Labour members of the Committee, given they supported the Crossing on 7 occasions and at the October 2020 Cabinet, Cllr Danvers seconded the motion to proceed. This is a Labour sponsored project. Need to know what legal basis exists to halt this. I expect more Labour hypocrisy after having imposed this upon the town.
Dear Marie, I sincerely believe that our cllrs have been decieved by the developers, to attempt to build a crossing over a decommissioned landfill site which sits directly above the London Basin which is the drinking water of millions, the very real danger of contaminating that water as verified by Thames water and the Enviroment agency is iin itself reason to halt the development...
Dear Neil, I fail to see how they could have been deceived. As was shown clearly in a recent letter on Your Harlow, the former Labour administration supported this no less than 7 times. Furthermore, they formally adopted the crossing in their Harlow Development Plan December 2020. They undertook no public consultation. I cannot believe that they are that stupid. They had all the facts and signed up for this project.
Whoever was suckered by the developers or Government promises of grants the whole issue of transport and the crossings can be stopped now by Cllrs who are supposed to be representing Harlow voting against these plans. Nail your colour to the mast, and stop quibbling. Are Cllrs in the pockets of developers, it seems those from East Herts are, so it's down to Harlow Cllrs from all parties to stop these crossings and throw out the non "sustainable" transport plans. None benefit Harlow and all will do serious damage. Even the partners within hggt pfp have taken legal action to stop these crossings and that speaks volumes. There are greener and less costly options the Councils and developers have ignored and even published mistruths about, eg there are no alternative researched and modelled transport strategies that hggt pfp say have been done. Also insiders, potential whistleblowers, from the company engaged to plan the Eastern crossing raised road have serious reservations and the original questions from the Environment Agency about the devastating effects on the flood plain and thus the Habitats remain unanswered.
Hi Marie, I'm certainly not trying to defend Labour's track record.. My loyalty is to this town, not any political party and I hope those elected as Councillors feel the same. I think its shameful that this crossing got Into the Local Town Plan, Our Conservative Council has the ability to stop this crossing in its tracks. There is no substance to the tossing in the town plan. On paper the crossing reads like a twee bridge crossing the River Stort and a country lane leading to Gilston, better still its to be a "Sustainable Transport Corridor" (whatever that means in govt newspeak). However it's not... Its a humungious Elevated Highway and the Devil is in the detail, so they say. If anyone has any influence at all they should be insisting on a full enquiry before this is passed through planning. Surely it is putting the "Cart before the Horse" to build this Highway to a Town HGGT which doesn't even exist yet. My thoughts arent revolutionary... All I say is WAIT
Dear Neil, we are faced with any ongoing problem: the strategic London -Cambridge corridor will attract many new businesses requiring skilled, well-paid employees. This will offer opportunities for Harlow young people and for people moving to the area. They will demand good quality housing and amenities. This could spur a regeneration and uplift of Harlow, raising its standards with a better cultural and leisure options. On the other side, we all want to protect our green spaces and natural environment. We all want the benefits, but not in my backyard. It is difficult to reconcile these two aspirations. If we want a better town, we need to offer opportunities to retain our best people and to attract others from elsewhere. I do not see an easy solution. We want more high end companies offering skilled jobs and this means more quality housing and infrastructure. Harlow itself is full and has a very high density. The only solution is to build beyond its current borders and expect that the administrative structure will be changed to bring the expanded urban area under a single authority.
Well Marie, many of us believe that it should have been a pre-requisite to the creation of the Harlow and Gilston Garden town that Harlow's boundary should be changed to include what is after all mostly just fields. Decisions about the future of the Green Belt would then have been made in the Civic Offices in Harlow and not Hertford. It has clearly been said that at best all our Council can do is to try an influence what will be built. No undertaking has been given to help provide homes for those on Harlow Council's Housing Register, Essex roads will be pounded by more traffic and residents here will have to put up with more noise and pollution. East Herts D C however will receive all the financial benefits, including millions of pounds in New Homes bonus and Council tax payments, the new residents will contribute not a penny to Harlow Council's discretionary services such as Pets Corner or the Playhouse. No-one will surely agree to a change in boundaries in the future? The Sustainable Transport Corridors will see lots of the green space in Harlow destroyed, it is designed to try and keep residents living over the border to avoid using their car, it helps no-one in Harlow. Developments will destroying hundreds of acres of Green Belt and to the West of Harlow is actually destroying lots of jobs as the commercial greenhouse on site will be removed. PAH will be in the EFDC area who will benefit from the large tax payments made. Trouble is, all five Councils involved took steps to ensure that residents in Harlow were not consulted about these plans.
East Herts graciously extended the speaking time to 8 minutes. This 8 minutes was split between 3 speakers opposing the central crossing (5 minutes, 1 minute and 2 minutes) and 4 speakers on the Eastern crossing (2 minutes each). The Applicant had 8 full minutes for each application. The meeting started at 5.30pm - was delayed due to the vice chair being stuck in traffic in Gascoyne Way, Hertford - then a 30 minute recess was given so that the councillors could read a letter that had been submitted at 9.58pm the previous evening. The meeting ended at around 12.15AM. Yes. The meeting went past midnight. This is such a monumental decision for the residents of Harlow that I am pleased that the 3 people opposing the applications will each have 6 minutes to speak. The crossing and the Flyover will only benefit East Herts council, not Harlow. All the regeneration work in the town centre will be wasted as the the increased traffic, including the construction traffic for the Garden Towns that have not yet been granted planning permission, will be BY PASSING the town, The inhabitants of the Garden Town villages (as opposed to the villages that are being divided to make way for these 'villages') will be spending their money at Brookfield Farm and Cambridge.
14 Comments for Date for Stort River Crossing planning application announced: