XII I II III IIII V VI VII VIII IX X XI

Harlow Council lodges official objection to plans for Latton Priory development

Business / Sat 18th Jan 2025 at 01:04pm

HARLOW Council has officially objected to plans for the Latton Priory development, saying it does not believe the current proposals would deliver the improvements and investment the town needs.

An outline planning application for the proposed Latton Priory development, located on Harlow’s southern border within the Epping Forest District and for up to 1,340 homes, was submitted last October by Commercial Estates Projects Ltd and Hallam Land.

Consultation has been taking place since then. Harlow Council encouraged residents to engage with the application and secured an extension for the public to respond to it.

Harlow Council’s detailed, 13-page response explains that despite supporting the principle of development at Latton Priory in line with the Harlow and Gilston Garden Town initiative, having reviewed the plans it has a number of “substantial concerns”.

Its response outlines that if granted the application as submitted would have a detrimental impact on Harlow’s residents and place pressure on existing services and facilities in the district. It would fail to deliver the transport infrastructure needed to reduce the impact of the development on the road network, including local routes in Harlow such as Rye Hill Road and Junction 7 on the M11.

Harlow Council also highlighted a lack of funding for other infrastructure including enhancements to Harlow Town Station, bus service provision, indoor sports facilities, public art to support Harlow’s status as a Sculpture Town, libraries, Harlow Museum and for household waste and recycling facilities.

A lack of clarity and reassurance on providing the new healthcare and education facilities the development will need was also given as grounds for objecting to the application.

Councillor Alastair Gunn, Cabinet Portfolio Holder for Garden Town and Planning, said:

“When the Latton Priory planning application was submitted last year, I said we would review the application in detail and submit a formal response that focused on the needs of Harlow residents, and on securing the best possible outcome for the town as a whole. In objecting to this application, that is what we have done.

“This is not about opposing new housing developments on principle. Harlow needs to secure investment if we are to rebuild our town and renew our neighbourhoods. We can do that by supporting good quality, sustainable development proposals. For example, we’ve supported the Gilston villages development where, by working with our Garden Town partners, we helped secure £1.3 billion that will be invested into Harlow.

“Unfortunately, after carefully reviewing the Latton Priory application, we found several areas of concern. These will need to be addressed to secure our support for these plans to proceed.

“Latton Priory may not be within Harlow’s current district borders but if it does go ahead, it will very much be a part of our town. It cannot be a separate estate that adds nothing to Harlow beyond putting more pressure on our roads and public services.

“That is why we have formally objected to this application. We will now focus on seeking a better outcome for Harlow. We will be happy to work with our other Garden Town partners to help Epping Forest District Council and the applicants bring forward a scheme that we can support guided by our missions to secure investment for Harlow’s future, to rebuild our town and renew our neighbourhoods.”

A copy of Harlow Council’s full response can be viewed on the Epping Planning Portal: https://eppingforestdc.my.site.com/pr/s/planning-application/a0hTv000001vZuwIAE/epf179324?c__r=Arcus_BE_Public_Register&tabset-dc51c=2

9 Comments for Harlow Council lodges official objection to plans for Latton Priory development:

Nicholas Taylor
2025-01-18 14:04:27

At last Harlow Council is supporting the views of many Harlow residents who have long believed that the plan to build close to the town will do nothing to improve the lives of those who already live here. The developers are already trying to riggle out of providing the necessary infrastucture by not referring to or giving scant information about previous committements. In the meantime EFDC are of course happy to see the plan go ahead because the effects on residents living in their District are minimal when compared to Harlow.

Sheila Reynolds
2025-01-18 15:57:22

Typical Epping Forest attempting a large build on somebody else's door step yet again. So that town takes the strain. Good job in objecting Harlow Council. The consequences of such a large build on the edge of the busy M11 roundabout don't bare thinking about.

David Forman
2025-01-19 00:11:44

Greedy developers given the green light by Epping Forest District Council, who can only see the New Homes Bonus flowing into their coffers. Well done Harlow Council in objecting to this development.

Tim
2025-01-19 00:19:08

At last harlow council objecting to the plans that have no benefit to the town only to increase congestion in area and turn all local roads into rat runs like rye Hill Road already is

Tiredoffailedpoliticalnorms
2025-01-19 01:54:36

Well done Harlow Town Council. This is exactly what is needed, some spine and resolve in standing up to EFDC’s lazy and cynical attempt to offload onto Harlow. Understand development is needed, but not like this. Keep it up and well done again! Shame on you EFDC !

AB
2025-01-19 06:06:54

As well as pushing for supporting infrastructure at Layton Priory, Harlow Council should be pushing for a boundary change that will ensure Layton Priory is within whatever boundary Harlow finishes up in. EFDC will play hardball over this as they did at the time the New Town local government was initiated, and they need putting in their place.

Tony
2025-01-19 07:52:18

May I suggest that EDFC is the more competent planning authority and if we aren’t to end up with another Gilden Park (100 percent in Harlow), we should leave it in Epping Forest Harlow approves 91% of all planning applications. Epping Forest has the 4th lowest approval rate in England at 69%.

Nostradamus SOS
2025-01-19 10:13:21

Whilst this is objection should be applauded on the basis of the points made it's a great pity that Harlow Councillors are blind to the fact that everyone of these points of objection apply at last 10000 times more powerfully to the East Herts and Epping Councils hggt pfp developments at Gilston and those to the North East of our town. Developments that'll overload Harlow. A solution would be if the Latton development were relocated around Epping Town and the Gilston estate around Hertford town.

Seamus
2025-01-22 12:16:04

By the developers own admission in the planning application, Rye Hill Road will as a minimum, expect over 400 extra daily journeys on Rye Hill Road with most of them being HGV's, LGV's and many other commercial vehicles over the 4 years the build is expected to last. If you use Rye Hill Road you will know there is no way on earth it can cope safely, that level and type of traffic. Until the developer can find a safe and reliable access route then this development should not go forward.

Leave a Comment Below:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *