XII I II III IIII V VI VII VIII IX X XI

Campaigners disappointed at Lower Thames Crossing decision

News / Wed 26th Mar 2025 at 07:10am

OPPONENTS of a proposed £9 billion road crossing between Kent and Essex say they are “devastated and deeply disappointed” after it got the go ahead from Government reports the Local Democracy Reporter.

Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander has approved a Development Consent Order (DCO) application by National Highways for the 14.5-mile Lower Thames Crossing – a move described as “madness” by campaigners.

Work on the project has been ongoing since 2009, and more than £800 million of taxpayers’ money has been spent on planning.

The crossing is aimed at reducing congestion on the Dartford Crossing with a new motorway-style road.

However, it would cut through large swathes of Thurrock green belt and campaigners and cross party politicians have fought against it.

Following the announcement, Jen Craft Labour MP for Thurrock, said: “I am obviously disappointed by today’s decision. I still have concerns around the disruption this scheme will cause to local residents and the impact on air quality in the area.

“I fully recognise that congestion at the Dartford Crossing is causing misery for drivers, but building more roads is not the answer. I still believe that alternatives such as investment in cross river public transport would provide a more sustainable solution.”

John Kent, Labour leader of Thurrock Council, said he was “deeply disappointed” at the decision. He said: “We fully understand the need to relieve congestion at the Dartford Crossing – we live with that congestion on a daily basis – and we support the need for greater connectivity across the Thames.

“However, we still believe, as we always have, this crossing is in the wrong place. It won’t resolve the very real problems caused by congestion at the Dartford Crossings, it will cause real damage to our environment and ecology and do little to add to the resilience of our local roads network.”

Conservative Barry Johnson, shadow councillor for place and environment said he was “devastated and appalled” by the decision. He said: “This will not solve the issues around the Dartford Crossing, but will extend them throughout the whole of Thurrock. This is a disastrous decision for Thurrock, it will bulldoze our countryside, gridlock our roads, and pollute our air.”

Chris Todd, director of the Transport Action Network campaign group, called the decision “absolute madness” and claimed costs could rise to £16billion. He added: “It’s a desperate decision to distract from the likely bad news in the Chancellor’s Spring Statement.

“When the Government can’t afford to properly fund the NHS and our roads are falling apart, it’s cutting back on benefits and putting vulnerable people at risk. It really has got its priorities in a muddle. Rather than boosting growth, this will clog up roads in the south east and slow the economy down even more.”

5 Comments for Campaigners disappointed at Lower Thames Crossing decision:

Chris
2025-03-26 08:16:45

the classic 'one more lane will fix it' mentality strikes again. Instead of focusing on making public transport more reliable and affordable let's spaff a load of taxpayer money on another road, that'll fix it. Braindead.

David Forman
2025-03-26 08:43:40

Greater London Council leader Ken Livingstone's Fares Fair scheme of 1981 subsidized fares on public transport by use of Rates revenues. It substantially cut vehicle numbers entering London and increased public transport use. See article https://www.keybuses.com/article/fares-fair-40-years

Kim
2025-03-26 08:48:28

I firmly believe the Green party, will be the only party to save our green and pleasant lands.... I believe what Chris Todd has said hear, is absolutely spot on. This government will steal from the poor and give it to the rich. It's an absolute disgrace, it's a crule government we have. I thought the blues were bad, but this lot, give me strength.

Seamus
2025-03-26 13:17:56

I hope tax payers money isn't being used after the Queen Elizabeth debacle. Under the original agreement when the bridge was built, tolling was supposed to stop once it had paid for itself, which was almost 15 years ago. In February 1999, the government announced the Dartford crossing would be free of toll charges by the end of 2003. We seem to be paying for more but getting less for that money as quango's soak up the cash.

Stuart J
2025-03-26 21:35:49

Well you’ve got to thank Tony Blair’s Labour government for that. In 2001 they decided to backtrack on the agreement to make the crossing tolls permanent free by 2003, instead to keep the tolls and use the money for uk wide transport improvements. Despite successive government promises to remove the tolls, in 2019 the Conservative government made an order to make the tolls permanent. In 2023 the tolls and fines generated an income of £215m, it’s tops the list for uk toll income.

Leave a Comment Below:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *