Blogpost: From hostility hurled at others in the street, to extreme nationalism being unfurled on our roadside and graffitied on church walls
General / Wed 17th Sep 2025 at 10:53am
IN the last few weeks I have been struggling to know what to say. Whilst this happens occasionally, it seldom lasts as long as this.
From hostility and hatred hurled at others in the street, to evidence of extreme nationalism being unfurled on our roadside and graffitied on church walls, to the murder of Charlie Kirk, to the tens of thousands rallying in London under the banner “unite the kingdom” when their leaders aim is to do quite the opposite.

It’s a struggle to compose that paragraph and know what to say next, especially when your heart knows that silence is not the answer either.
I am grateful then, that this morning I read a blog post from an individual and an organisation I have the upmost respect for. I hope that Your Harlow will be happy to share it with their readers.
I consider it to be balanced, measured, respectful and faithful.
This blog, which follows, contains many messages but above all the need to understand and to learn, cry out to me. I do not ask nor expect anyone to agree with me or Bekah, but I do hope and pray that our community will unite around those needs – to understand and to learn.
Ian Beckett
==============
Charlie Kirk: a separation of realities
By Bekah Legg, 15 September 2025
I have to confess to not having had a huge awareness of Charlie Kirk before he died. I had seen snippets of some of the racist views he held. I was aware that he suggested girls should only go to university to find a husband, that he’d be uneasy on a plane piloted by a black man, and that he thought one of my personal heroes, Martin Luther King Jr., was an awful man. But I didn’t pay him much attention – just another conservative evangelical who had conflated faith with nationalism and white supremacy. Just another ‘Christian’ who wouldn’t have allowed brown Jesus to enter their country, let alone their heart.
And then he was shot, and my social media feeds lit up with messages of grief and loss for a ‘hero of the faith’. People I know and love, with whom I thought I shared values, were mourning not just the state of affairs, but a man I had intentionally distanced myself from.
I didn’t understand.
I spent my week wrestling with whether I wanted to say anything myself, and what I would say if I did. This week, of all weeks, I am aware of the horror of watching your husband die. Tomorrow it will be one year since I held my husband’s hand as he took his last breath. A victim of cancer, not gun crime, but no less devastating. I can only begin to imagine the overwhelming emotions and loss Erika Kirk and her children are experiencing. To have to do that in the public eye, with so many expectations on you, with people calling out your loved one’s worst moments? Well, I didn’t want to pile into that.
But I felt isolated seeing friends post positively about him. I started reassessing who was safe to have certain conversations with and who I would have to be on my guard around. I wondered if Restored had lost some allies.
What was happening in my head, I realised, was massively magnified for those more directly impacted by some of Kirk’s messaging. On my church Facebook group, I saw a post beatifying him, followed by worried posts from people with Asian, African or Middle Eastern heritage worrying whether they were safe in a church which supported Kirk’s views.
This is not a side issue.
The reality is that two realities are running in parallel, facilitated by the algorithms of social media. Algorithms that most of us don’t understand but which silently control our lives through the content we consume. Some of us in the Christian world have been fed news about Charlie Kirk that revealed his darker side: misogyny, white supremacy, nationalism and homophobia. Others had a heartier meal of gospel preaching, smiles and reaching young people in debate, not violence. We literally have two different versions of Charlie Kirk. Both are based in reality, but neither give the whole picture.
What we need to learn
It helps to understand the different perspectives, but the lesson doesn’t lie in quietly respecting or tolerating those differences without ever bringing challenge. There are some crucial things to note:
Big news headlines have an impact on our personal lives
This week, as I’ve reflected on how I feel less safe than I did a week ago, I’ve made an effort to see my friends from other cultures and hear how much less secure they feel. I’ve also taken time to think about this through a survivor lens. Weeks like this are triggering for many of us. We know we don’t feel safe, but we can’t quite put a finger on why. In our little bubbles, nothing has really changed. We probably are safe, yet we can’t get it out of our heads, our senses are heightened; we’re hyper-vigilant.
It’s because weeks like this remind us that there was a time when we saw a reality that no one else did about someone. We were hurt, controlled by, and/or devalued by someone that everyone else loved, celebrated and wanted to be friends with. Maybe we weren’t believed when we sought help. We felt isolated, afraid, and desperate. Our world was not safe, and this week feels like that again. Our bodies are responding to the perceived threat in order to protect us.
People aren’t always what we think
At Restored, we see this twin reality world playing out in survivors’ lives again and again. Domestic abuse, by its very nature, happens in secret, and abusers present themselves very differently in public, at work and in church. The separation of realities is a tactic to control the victim. It means that when those who have been subjected to abuse seek help, they are often not believed. If we are to follow the call of God in Isaiah 58 to let the oppressed go free, then we have to be prepared to look further and to believe what seems impossible. We must choose to listen to those who are telling us their reality and not minimise it, try to contextualise it or say that the good things they do outweigh the harm. When we do that, we collude with the abuser, and we leave the one who has been harmed alone without support.
Silence favours the oppressor
In a world where challenge is so often seen as a dramatic take-down or the creation of a culture war, many of us don’t want to join in. But when no one challenges the glorifying of person whose words have rallied people to hatred, prejudice and even violence, those who were othered and labelled as less than feel isolated and afraid.
Those members of my church who only saw the post venerating Charlie Kirk and were afraid that the whole church agreed with his views on race.
My Colombian friend, who, for the first time, received a text from an organisation supporting Latin American women in the UK, warning her not to go into central London this weekend because it wasn’t safe.
It matters that we don’t silently disagree with hatred. It matters that we speak up with love, with welcome, and that we challenge a toxic culture.
How we talk matters
Kirk is heralded as a hero of free speech who debated those he disagreed with, but his death has unleashed a level of violent speech that betrays that. It matters that we take time to recognise our heightened emotions and consider what needs expressing and what doesn’t, and how we do that with wisdom and grace. Most of us, and indeed I count myself in this group, are not at our best in the heat of the moment; wisdom comes with reflection.
We have been purposefully divided
It suits those on the extremes to polarise the centre, not to mention the Church. These twin realities are not new; they’re as old as the Daily Mail/Mirror split or Telegraph/Guardian readership, but at least then you chose what to read, and the other headlines grabbed your eye on the newsstand. With the hidden world of social media, we are being herded into ghettos where we only hear what the powers that write the algorithms want us to see. Often, we’re oblivious to the other chapters in the story. If we are to faithfully follow Jesus, we must intentionally choose to find and read all the chapters.
Bekah Legg is Chief Executive Officer of Restored, a Christian alliance working to transform relationships and end violence against women.
Since 2010, the heart of Restored has been to see an end to violence against women and girls; to the Church to take up its place in standing against injustice; and to providing places of welcome and safety for survivors.
For more information visit: www.restored-uk.org
The essential message is that you defeat your political opponents by careful research and well structured arguments that give voters the facts and, hopefully, offer them a viable alternative. Bullets only create martyrs, often undeserving ones.
Certainly in America, the amount of democrats laughing and high fiving due to Charlie's death was dissapointing but also foolish. The message they were giving out was that it was okay to execute people you politically disagree with, they didn't even see what they may have done is now place themselves in the sights of lunatics too, such was the hatred. As to the Unite the Kingdom event, what if I said to you there were 423 arrests, 32 assaults on police, 46 possession of an offensive weapon, 70 possession of canabis, 32 possession of class A, 44 drug supplying, 5 robbery, 4 violence with injury, 36 other violence, 18 sexual offences and 136 other offences all happened at the Unite the Kingdom event? Some would be all up in arms shouting all kinds of far right claims. Those same people would go deadly quiet if I told you that those figures and offences are actually the met police's figures for the 2025 Notting Hill Carnival. In that regard I would agree on the point of perception in the article written.
David Foreman, even now the left make vile digs and comments on a young man murdered in front of his wife and children. Your comment mere days after this incident about martyrs often whom are undeserving ones is not only poorly timed but also probably directed towards Kirk. The left ideology is hate filled and often very violent. It is all for free speech ‘until you disagree with it’. Bring on the next General Election and we shall see who the majority of this country support. Most of this country back Trump’s visit to UK, but the media would have you believe that nearly the whole of the UK despise him, this is propaganda at it’s best. Btw I do not condone and violence or discrimination to any side or person.
Dear Terence, an example of a deserving martyr was King Edmund who refused to renounce his Christian faith and was executed for his refusal by the Vikings. A more up to date example is the WWII SOE agent Violette Szabo who was tortured and abused by the Nazis but refused to betray her comrades. Murder to settle a political score is unacceptable in any circumstance. See Ms Szabo at https://internationalbcc.co.uk/about-ibcc/news/violette-szabo-george-cross/#:~:text=Violette%20was%20taken%20to%20Paris,just%20twelve%20weeks%20before%20peace.
Terence, the fact is Charlie Kirk was assassinated by a right-wing extremist, so nothing to do with the Left. As for martyrdom, it all depends where you set the bar. For me an example is Violette Szabo, an agent for the Special Operations Executive, who was captured by the Nazis and brutally tortured in a Paris prison. She refused to betray her contacts and fellow agents and as a result was executed in Ravensbruck concentration camp. See https://www.iwm.org.uk/history/who-was-violette-szabo
I'm sorry David but you're wrong, the killer was not far right. His partner was a male claiming to be transitioning to female and a "furry", neither are far right traits. The killer had actually scratched in shell casings with one saying "hey facist, catch" and he had been far left radicalised on the internet because Kirk did not believe in trans. Even his own familly said he had become radicalised online and was fixated with Charlie Kirk, particularly his trans views given the killers partner was trans and furry.
Seamus, as this recent Reuters article says "Prosecutors have not said which specific viewpoints of Kirk’s that Robinson found hateful, or whether his partner’s gender identity may have played a role." So whether the assassin was left or right motivated is speculation. Someone who was truly Left leaning would not see assassination as a political tool. Nor does trans rights singularly characterise Left ideals. I for one believe that the trans rights issue has got blown out of proportion, that women only spaces must be protected and that biological sex should determine participation in sporting competitions. Britain's communist CPGB-ML are particularly strident on the trans points above. See Reuters article at https://www.reuters.com/world/us/unresolved-questions-hang-over-case-against-charlie-kirks-accused-killer-2025-09-17/
Seamus, to clarify trans rights and Left idealism a good article by Blue Labour says: "In the culture of capitalism the desire for self-realisation and an authentic life is a productive source of market value. Identity politics becomes the singular pursuit of self-interest detached from social obligations. The only thing that has validity is one’s own self-engendered consensus immune from all external criticism. There is no constraint on the pursuit of self-realisation except the community one belongs to. It is only a short step to unreason and pseudoscience, and to the use of threats, physical intimidation and denunciation against those who disagree with you." The last sentence may well characterise Charlie Kirk's killer's mindset, but obviously I'd like to see court evidence to be sure. See Blue Labour at https://www.bluelabour.org/home/the-trans-debate-and-the-labour-party-1
8 Comments for Blogpost: From hostility hurled at others in the street, to extreme nationalism being unfurled on our roadside and graffitied on church walls: