XII I II III IIII V VI VII VIII IX X XI

Harlow Council leader puts pressure on London councils over office blocks

News / Wed 31st Jul 2019 at 09:34am

Dear Editor,

RESIDENTS of Harlow may well have heard stories recently about so called “permitted developments”, particularly Terminus House on BBC Radio Essex, on the BBC local television news programmes and the issue will be covered on Channel 4 tonight (George Clarke’s Council House Scandal). Some of the stories, which focus on criminal activity may have been quite alarming, so I thought I would write to inform Harlow residents of the current situation and steps the Council and other organisations we are working with, are taking to deal with the problem.

Firstly some background: London boroughs and many other authorities have a housing crisis. The country has not built enough affordable housing for years, but the crisis is made worse by the Local Housing Allowance (LHA) which put a limit on the maximum rent boroughs could pay to house benefit claimants. Since 2010 housing benefit levels have not risen in line with rising private rents, and a freeze in LHA since 2016 means that they will remain frozen at their 2016 levels until 2020, regardless of how much private rents go up in each local area. The effect is that many local authorities have found it impossible to house individuals and families within their own boroughs. In looking for a solution they have sought accommodation outside London.

Compounding this, in 2013 the Government introduced “permitted development rights”. This allowed the owners of office buildings to convert them into residential accommodation without the need for planning permission. Some of these conversions offer very small apartments, they are often not ideally situated and no contribution towards infrastructure such as, schools, doctors’ surgeries, playgrounds etc. is made.

These two pieces of legislation have resulted in the toxic situation we find ourselves in today where some authorities are off loading their housing crisis onto Harlow. Among those residents relocated are some with a criminal history and some with drink or drug problems. Concentrating these individuals into a few blocks has inevitably caused an increase in levels of reported criminal activity to the detriment of Harlow residents. Equally serious is harm it is causing on vulnerable families who are also moved into these flats, to be housed next door to those with criminal pasts, which serves only to make them more vulnerable.

Additionally, where another council has moved someone to Harlow and they are being placed in temporary accommodation via the homelessness route, then the Housing Benefit is paid by the originating Local Authority. If this is a London borough or in fact any area where the LHA is higher than Harlow rates, the landlord can charge a higher rent which unfairly increase rent prices in Harlow and makes finding affordable accommodation much harder for Harlow residents.

So what are we doing about it? Residents will be aware that Labour Councillor Tony Edwards led a campaign to increase policing in the town centre. After years of Tory cuts to policing, this is now beginning to be reversed; a visible town centre police force is to be welcomed. Furthermore, Harlow Council’s Community Safety team has been given new powers under a Public Space Protection Order to deal with anti-social behaviour.

I have met with Leaders of councils across Essex and taken our concern to the Leaders of London councils in a concerted effort to persuade them to find other solutions to their housing crisis other than off-loading it onto Harlow and elsewhere in Essex. In the meantime, they should urgently contribute to the costs we are incurring due to the demands being placed on our schools and other community services by their relocations. I am pleased to say the Leaders of London Councils seem receptive to the issues and have promised to seek a solution, and in this regard the negative publicity they are receiving in the national media is welcome. The Council is also working hard to introduce what are known as “Article 4 Directives” across the town to stop further Permitted Development conversions.

All this is however dealing with the symptoms of the problem. If the social cleansing is to stop then the government needs to do two things: Firstly remove the Local Housing Allowance rent cap so that London authorities can find accommodation “in borough”. Secondly, repeal the permitted development legislation that has allowed commercial property companies to avoid planning controls and put profits ahead of the duty to provide decent, safe homes.

The people of Harlow and across the UK deserve a return to house building that focuses on building decent homes for people to live in and bring up their families in with security, rather than the current delivery of housing units as an opportunity to maximise financial returns on investments as is currently the case.

Yours sincerely

Mark Ingall

Leader, Harlow District Council

18 Comments for Harlow Council leader puts pressure on London councils over office blocks:

MickyB77
2019-07-31 10:39:38

Are you telling us that no-body could object to these developments ? Perhaps if Bliar and Brown and the rest of that shoddy outfit hadn't spent the massive subsidy left by the Tories, and all the other mad-cap spending, notwithstanding, the £5 billion gold reserves sold off at a knock-down price by them too. How many houses did the Labour shambles build. It's very true. Labour encourages Poverty by it's calamitous spending, of other peoples money. What a council we have, they crow about being capable of doing the job, but, obviously, they are not the best at doing it.

jhumphreys84
2019-07-31 12:56:17

Firstly, this is great news that the council is doing something about this and should be commended for doing so. However, the tone of this letter really gets my back up, by starting off blaming everybody else. Saying the tories have done this and the tories have done that. Importantly government is made up of both Labour and Conservative, and to get through i bet some Labour MPs and Peers ok'd this as legislation so it's not all the Conservative's fault. Secondly, during the time period mentioned (2013) Labour we're the party in power in this local council. So why has it taken until now to raise opposition to this? Please stop over politicising every single point, it's not always the Tories fault, not all Labour are on the left and want masses of social housing. Work together to find the right solution instead of blaming each other then people may be a bit more receptive. Negative campaigning and digs at the opposition all the time on every subject are just tiresome...

durcant
2019-07-31 15:53:41

Whilst I do to want to sound like a total creep, I want to congratulate the leader of the council for taking such a positive position on this subject. Many of the local business are reporting real problems since Terminus house had a change of use. It’s very difficult to attract and retain small business when they have to suffer this impact. As the cabinet member for Economic growth isn’t vital that we support all aspects of the town centre. Small shops live off small incomes and any change can mean closure. The wider debate is also a problem. I went to the AGM of the CCG who were expressing deep concerns about our ability as a town wide community to support and maintain services as a result of terminus house and other areas. Let’s be honest the owners of terminus house and temple field bought this purely for profit and appear little interested in the people or the wider community. It is absolutely true it was the Tories who allowed this to happen. Equally all governments share the blame and responsibility for not funding the building and maintenance of council homes. Well done leader of Harlow Council.

tenpin
2019-07-31 17:42:24

The fact is, both main political parties are equally to blame for the present housing crisis, which has been building up for decades. There is no longer time to keep looking back or playing the blame game. Unless radical solutions are brought forward and don't end up in a bun fight between both Parties then the situation will only get worse. Cllr Ingall is right to highlight the need to change benefit levels and the Legislation allowing Permitted Development. I would go further however, so for instance Harlow Council should have been allowed to keep the £3.5 million it got from the sale of Council house in Harlow and not have to "find" another £11 million or so to build new Council homes (30/70% split). It should also be allowed to use this money to buy new homes at for example at Newhall or those along Gilden Way. I do think Durcant is somewhat off the mark about the owners of Terminus House, who will have been given very little information about the families they are being sent by London Boroughs and others. It is not easy to evict a person and it can take some time to do so, in the meantime other residents have to put up with the situation. More resources are clearly needed for those dealing with these new families to the town otherwise the concerns being expressed will have an affect on more and more residents and businesses.

durcant
2019-07-31 18:44:23

No one is suggesting that any one should be evicted but it a simple truth that other councils have found an opportunity to move families out of London and it to unsuitable accommodation. Moving the issue is not dealing with the issue. The truth is that whilst Harlow is an open and welcoming community the current community structure can’t cope. Listen to those in health,policing ,business and education. The families and the wider community are the losers. The winners are the owners of terminus house who I suspect are making a very tidy profit out of the London councils, at Harlow expense. Let’s be honest they would close tomorrow and evict tomorrow if they were not making a profit tomorrow.

tenpin
2019-07-31 20:29:05

Durcant, I suspect that many of the law abiding tenants in Terminus House do want some of those that are acting illegally and or causing anti social behaviour to be evicted for their and their families safety and well being, just as the Council evict tenants for such behaviour. A landlord needs to go through the legal process to do so however.There are no winners in this situation and I would not be surprised if the ownership of Terminus House becomes a merry go round. Having managed the Council's own homeless accommodation in the past I know only to well how draining on resources this can be and certainly in my day the Council would never have provided such homes in such a large block. Occasia House faced similar problems, which many of us said before it opened that it was simply to large. The problem now is that many office conversions are not homes where a mortgage can be obtained so owners have to find occupants from elsewhere. Harlow Council should have invested by buying Terminus when it could have, just as another council has in Harlow as reported in these pages earlier this week.

kthe5
2019-07-31 21:04:11

Hi Micky "How many houses did the Labour shambles build." That's easy to answer. Due to the laws passed by the [Conservative[ Thatcher government there was virtually no social housing built by any local councils since the 1980's. So the flow of new social housing was virtually stopped. Then there was the Help To Buy scheme which further reduced the existing supply of social housing. Nice to see you using a different deflection technique this time. I haven't seen you mention the sell off of the gold reseves before. Hi jhumphreys "Saying the tories have done this and the tories have done that. " From what I can tell (5 mins on google) at least some of the relevant laws were passed in 2015 when there was a healthy Conservative majority. So, yes, it it very likely that the Conservatives are wholely to blame for the laws that allow the likes of Terminus House to be crammed with sub-standard housing for profit. Hi tenpin "The fact is, both main political parties are equally to blame" True. The article above mentions the Local Housing Allowance. This was introduced by Labour in 2008, and the rules have been tightened by the Conservative governments since. Both main parties have contributed to the situation. tenpin, you say (referring to Terminus House?) "in my day the Council would never have provided such homes in such a large block.", but then: "Harlow Council should have invested by buying Terminus when it could have". If Terminus would have been too draining on resources, why would Harlow Council have wasted tax payers money on buying Terminus at that time?

kthe5
2019-07-31 21:09:11

"Occasia House faced similar problems" As I understand it, Occasia House is (was?) owned by ECC, not Harlow Council. Shame it's been empty all this time. Seems a waste of space to me.

tenpin
2019-08-01 07:17:28

kthe5, I need to put you straight on a couple of points. When Labour came into power in 1997, having promised for years in opposition that they would allow Councils to build houses, they placed a financial straight jacket on Councils which meant that most couldn't, the result of which meant that on average just 500 council homes per year were built across the whole country during the next 13 years.. When I said that Harlow Council would not have provided such accommodation in such a large block I meant homes for homeless families. They could and should have bought the block and converted it into say 100 spacious family type homes and housed families from it's housing register. As it is, over 220 families live in temporary accommodation, most having come from miles away without the family and other support needed. Occasia House was run by a Housing Association(London and Quadrant? one of the biggest in the Country), not a Council. Providing temporary homes in such large numbers simply does not work.

jhumphreys84
2019-08-01 08:52:39

kthe5, i do see where you are coming from pointing to conservative policies, but they are not all to blame. As others have said here it is successive governments that have made a string of decisions in housing policy that's lead to this, both Labour and Conservative. My point about this article is that starting off the first half of the letter, attacking and blaming the opposition party does not add anything to solving the situation. You could have cut the top half of the letter off and it would still be the same situation. Had it have been cut off it would have been regarded as a good positive move that most people in Harlow will get behind. Instead a massive opportunity has been lost to galvanise opinion because some people are not above getting a dig into the opposition first on something that doesn't actually change the situation we are in or the solution. So then instantly you put the back up of everyone who doesn't support Labour. This is why it was such a disappointing read and means that actually, nobody can take the moral high ground as they are all as bad as each other at this.

D.p.l
2019-08-01 09:03:12

Who the hell is he trying to kid. He is in on this himself. This is a,way of gain more votes by housing London residents from Labour administrated boroughs. Plus it is also a way of making it look like the Mayor of London is hitting his targets on building homes for London residents, well if he want to convert office block's into flats then he should convert the office block's in London into flats not office block's in the Towns including Harlow. I am 100% against office block's being converted into flats but the office block's in Harlow that have been converted into flats should be for the Harlow residents who have bern on the waiting list for years and not for the overflow of London. If I remember likely, the leader of Harlow council, before the local elections, stated that he was going to stop office block's in Harlow being converted into flats, too late now isn't it Cllr Ingall, they have all been converted. That was just another way of gaining dirty votes by make a false statement to the Harlow residents.

D.p.l
2019-08-01 09:05:57

Who the hell is he trying to kid. He is in on this himself. This is a,way of gaining more votes by housing London residents from Labour administrated boroughs. Plus it is also a way of making it look like the Mayor of London is hitting his target on building homes for London residents, well if he wants to convert office block's into flats then he should convert the office block's in London into flats not office block's in the Towns including Harlow. I am 100% against office block's being converted into flats but the office block's in Harlow that have been converted into flats should be for the Harlow residents who have been on the waiting list for years and not for the overflow of London. If I remember likely, the leader of Harlow council, before the local elections, stated that he was going to stop office block's in Harlow being converted into flats, too late now isn't it Cllr Ingall, the damage has already been done they have all been converted into flats That was just another way of gaining dirty votes by make a false statement to the Harlow residents.

durcant
2019-08-01 13:32:13

Very interesting responses. I can confirm that the leader of the council made a commitment to stop anymore office blocks/warehouse type building being converted into short term accommodation. To achieve this the council is current having to consult with all businesses and owners of properties that could be converted. The council is introducing an article 4 to stop anymore converted buildings We should have this completed soon. This is then sent to the minister and unless they object Harlow will not have anymore terminus house/ temple fields. The leader is true to his word.

tenpin
2019-08-01 15:35:40

But of course, after the horse has bolted. Action should have been taken as long ago as 2014 as many other Councils did, which is why Harlow is being used by so many other Councils to provide temporary accommodation for their homeless families.. Not Cllr Ingall's fault we all know but it was the fault of the Labour administrations. The Council's Plan for the Town Centre needs a huge investment, the Council should have been proactive and taken a lead, by buying up property in the Town Centre before developers had the chance to make these office conversions. In view of the problems since then, maybe some of these developers would be prepared to sell up?

MickyB77
2019-08-01 17:56:51

Absolutely typical of this disparate council, the ruling group are un-fit to manage the affairs of Harlow, or anywhere else, indeed, they're so far behind, un-aware of rules, regulations and methods of solving local problems. Without doubt, they could, and should have blocked all these conversion type dwellings. So, why didn't they. Ask the question, have we the best people in place to promote and regulate the advancement of Harlow, and the villages ? They tell us that we have, by adopting Laura Mac / Mrs A......i, to act on our behalf, are you serious ? Labour will, bring you to Poverty !

durcant
2019-08-01 19:51:16

I love the idea that people can snatch a date or a year and complain, if only. 5 years ago the priority of the council was to ensure our own council stock and our own tenants were living is suitable and sustainable homes. There has been a long programme of new kitchens, bathrooms as well as windows and doors. 5 years ago we were developing the plan which was achieved by building new council homes the first in over 25 years. 5 years ago we were developing Clifton hatch. 5 years ago we were Developing Carter mead and after over a decade nearly now at the completion of the Potters street redevelopment . 5 years ago we were developing the programme to develop Kao park and the Harlow science park to bring new opportunities and new investment into the town I could go on about the significant improvements that this Labour council has achieved for the benefits to the whole community. These are the real achievements of a council that puts it current and future community first. We know have another strong and dynamic leadership team taking us forward from officers to councillors. What ever way you look at it Terminus house isn’t the answer as this is based on profit first to the private sector. We need a government ready willing and able to empower local councils with real public funding to enable more council homes to be designed , developed and built.

tenpin
2019-08-01 23:08:13

Well Durcant you really are rambling now, so lets pick up on some of the points you have made about 5 years ago: 1 By giving priority to tenants the Council could do nothing else like issue Article 4 notices? 2 Giving such priority does not include maintaining the external fabric of its houses, which have not seen a repairs and painting programme for the best part of 15 years if not longer. 3 By now tenants of the very few new homes built 5 years ago and less can exercise their Right To Buy. The simple fact is, that 5 years later the Council owns less homes than it did in 2014. It should be building bungalows of a type which can never be sold. 4 Because of its dilly dallying it has taken well over a decade to get Prentice Place completed, in the meantime they lay empty for years and I understand that most if not all are no longer owned by the Council.. 5 The town and town centre are devoid of flower beds and trees are not being maintained. So much for trying to attract new businesses to the town (try taking a trip to Stevenage to see how things should be done). And while I am at it, in 2016 you were quoted as saying we needed Junction 7A and we need it now. Well 3 years on hundreds of new houses have been built, Kao park is expanding but there is no sign of the junction being started, so much for it being opened in 2021! The only thing we can agree on is your final paragraph.

durcant
2019-08-02 07:24:20

If rambling is defined by being honest and truthful then am delighted to be classed as a rambler. Sometimes some people can’t see or don’t want to see the improvement that we have made as a Labour council. Sometimes people are happy to have a half empty attitude and change the debate to flower beds. Sometimes changes are made and sometimes these haven’t worked. Sometimes projects take far too long to complete but we never gave up. I agree that we need a new junction and I have been on record a hundred times plus supporting a new junction 7 a for business growth,access and opportunity. I agree we need new planting and you will see we have committed funding for 1,000 new trees to be planted . I agree we need new flowers and you we have funding to plant wild flowers and meadows. My guess we can agree to disagree but am proud of Harlow and I proud to be part of a Labour council that is making a difference.

Leave a Comment Below:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *