Councillor Kay’s Blog: Whose child is it, anyway?
Education: Secondary / Tue 16th Jul 2024 at 08:03am

PUPILS who attend school well generally achieve more and enjoy better wellbeing than those who don’t. Evidence exists to support something that seems obvious.
Sometimes it’s not quite that easy. Children may have medical needs, disabilities or mental health conditions. Some children have caring responsibilities: for them, too, life (including school attendance) can be complicated.
From September 2024, all schools in England will be expected to consider a fine if a child has been absent for 5 days, if the absence is unauthorised. The fine will be £80 if paid in 21 days or £160 if paid in 28 days. Repeated incidences will escalate the punishment, possibly resulting in prosecution or a parenting order.
Nearly 400,000 penalty notices were issued to parents in England in 2022-23 for unauthorised pupil absences. Does it work? One headteacher said fines have no impact, pointing out that the relationship between school and parents is the most powerful factor; conversations make a difference. Most absences are caused by family holidays which can double in price outside term-time, a price unaffordable to many parents. If holiday costs were static, term-time absences wouldn’t be so frequent.
What happens in the rest of the UK? In Wales, headteachers can authorise 10 days in certain circumstances but repeated unauthorised absence can result in a fine. In Scotland, education authorities can issue attendance orders to make parents explain absence; refusal to comply can be penalised. These measures are infrequently used. Parents in Northern Ireland can be referred to the Education Welfare Service if attendance falls below 85%. Again, a fine can be used if there’s a failure to engage. The differences seem to be in emphasis and timing.
The Department for Education states schools and local authorities should use punitive measures ‘where deemed appropriate.’
Some parents are nervous and some will pay the fine in order to afford a holiday. Meanwhile, home schooling is increasing while the best headteachers are working hard to maintain healthy, meaningful and respectful communication. Parents are torn, seeing affordable holidays as essential to family wellbeing and, potentially, as a way of broadening horizons. One parent asked me ‘Whose child is it anyway?’ That could be the subject of another blog!
As long as a the cost of a holiday starting shortly before the school holidays is many hundreds of pounds cheaper, parents will continue to take their kids out early. As a parent, you'd have to be a real stickler for the rules not to leave for your holidays three days before the official school holidays if it means you can save £500 - £600. Those last few days and even weeks are often fairly meaningless with little or nothing going on in schools. My wife and I did it fairly regularly and it didn't affect our children's education at all.
I suppose the big, perhaps unanswered question, is "what is the purpose of school in the modern world"? When I was at school in the 1950s and 1960s the sources of information were limited to what the teacher said and a few library books. Mum was at home, I even went home for lunch. These days the internet provides an incredible source of knowledge which can be accessed 24/7 from literally everywhere in the world. So is school needed for education or is it needed so Mum can go to work and improve(?) our standard of living. The third alternative may be to help children to develop although I don't see too much of this in relation to future work skills requirement.
Peter - the purpose of school these days appears to be that the liberal left who have usurped our education system should tell boys that they're girls, and vice versa, as well as polluting our children's minds with other nonsense.
John, I am sure my school age Grandchildren would massively disagree with you.
Yet closing schools and causing untold damage to the children's education and mental health was fine. Do not say schools were open they might have been providing minimum child care, but there was NO education. The teaching unions where complicit in this to get back at the hated Tories. The child is not the states it is the parents. Honestly kids learn more on a family holiday than the do at schools. Beside we all know the real problem families you do not go after, instead you as always you go after normal families who work hard and just want a little fun. Why do people vote for muppets like Kay and the other labour /conservatives they all hate you and think they know what is best for you, they do not they are our servants it is time to send them all packing. I am glad my kid goes to private school failing that when the politics of envy destroys them, home schooling. Do not send your kids to the state schools, they are nothing but indoctrination factories.
Adam - well said.
State schooling is all about indoctrination and not education. Our society does not need a large educated work force anymore, so there is not focus on education at state schools. If you want to get educated you have no option to pay for it. Yet now they are going to tax you on that aswell. It’s as if they state actually want us to become a third world country. Up next, inheritance tax on pensions, which will put off people taking out pensions and increase the burden of the elderly on the state even more. Oh and why I am on it, the probation service is on brink of collapse as some bright spark thinks it’s a good idea to release lots of prisoners as the jails are full. We really need to come up with a way of getting better calibre politicians……..
Guy Flegman - I agree with everything you've said. The tax on private schools is an envy tax. I know people who send their kids to private schools to get a better education, and they're driving around in a 15 year old car and working two jobs to pay for it. Now Labour will add to their burden.
The Office for National Statistics in May 2022 highlighted a disturbing link between school truancy and criminality in adulthood. They said: "More than half (52.5%) of young adults who received custodial sentences had been persistently absent during schooling, compared with 35.9% of those with non-custodial sentences or cautions. Nearly three-quarters (72.2%) of those who had a custodial sentence had received a fixed exclusion compared with half (50.3%) of those with non-custodial sentences or cautions." https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/educationandchildcare/articles/theeducationandsocialcarebackgroundofyoungpeoplewhointeractwiththecriminaljusticesystem/may2022
One thing that has become very clear to me as a teacher is that the amount of time a child spends in school isn't as important as the quality of what the academic and social experience whilst they are there and the support parents give when children are at home. It's not rocket science, happy secure kids far out perform the "Gradgrind Halls " that many of our schools have become because of oversized classes poor resources and overstretched teachers. The holiday thing is a sop to those who want it to be necessary for both parents to be working full time to afford even the basics whilst most schools send students out on day trips through June or July. The "enlightened " employers of the 18th Century who built schools did it not so much to be altruistic but did it to provide child minding whilst accumulating massive wealth & paying workers low wages. Not much has changed, the government still ran on the basis that schools are essentially a means of being child minding, as illustrated by not closing schools very early in COVID pandemic. A decision that killed many elderly family members. Everyone knows children at school pick up many infectious diseases and bring them home and COVID was no exception.
10 Comments for Councillor Kay’s Blog: Whose child is it, anyway?: