Man fined £300,000 for felling 132 trees on estate
Crime / Sat 7th Sep 2024 at 09:53am
Mr Sukh Chamdal has been ordered to pay a £300,000 fine after pleading guilty to felling 132 trees at the Debden Hall Estate in 2021.
In passing sentence, the judge, Mr Recorder Clegg KC, noted that this case represented the most significant of its nature brought before the courts to date, in terms of the number of trees and acreage of land covered.

The 132 trees were the subject of a woodland Tree Preservation Order. The felling of them is an offence under Section 210 of The Town and Country Planning Act 1990.
Whilst the judge noted the defendant is of good character, and his undertaking to replacement planting at the site, the gravity of the offence meant that a substantial fine was imposed.
Mr Chamdal was ordered to pay a £300,000 fine less one-third reduction due to having pleaded guilty, meaning he has to pay sum of £200,000 within 3 months.
An undertaking for replacement planting was agreed by Mr Chamdal at the site. By the date of the sentencing hearing, on Friday 30 August 2024, Mr Chamdal had already paid Epping Forest District Council’s (EFDC) legal costs in full.
In addition to Mr Chamdal’s conviction, EFDC also prosecuted the arborists responsible for carrying out the tree works. They both pleaded guilty in June 2021:
Jan Lloyd was fined £20,000 plus costs
Watson Thomas was fined £20,000 plus costs
Councillor Paul Keska, EFDC Cabinet Member for Regulatory, Technical and Community Safety Services said:
“It is the council’s hope that these prosecutions will serve to prevent future, similar offences and emphasise our resolve in taking robust enforcement action where tree offences and other breaches of planning control occur.”
Should never be a crime his land his trees
Adam. The law does not work like that! The trees were under protection due to many factors. May I suggest you do some homework?
Darren I know the law does not work like that, but it still does not change the fact that the government should not be able to tell you what to do with your own land. We are supposed to be free after all (of course we not)
I guess Adam that is why Right-libertarianism wouldn’t work - We’d end up with no trees!
You’re got to ask yourself the question- why did he do it? he already knew that there would be a huge fine to pay. The obvious answer is a future property development scheme and these trees were in the way. By removing these now and planting replacement saplings, but these won’t be in the same area and won’t be interfering with these future plans. One less hurdle to overcome when they are submitted.
5 Comments for Man fined £300,000 for felling 132 trees on estate: