XII I II III IIII V VI VII VIII IX X XI

Chris Vince MP: It’s time to build the UKHSA’s new home in Harlow

News / Tue 17th Jun 2025 at 06:03am

CHRIS Vince, MP for Harlow, has stepped up his call for the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) to move forward with building its new world-class public health campus in Harlow, as the Labour Government nears a final decision on the long-stalled project.

Mr Vince said: “After nearly a decade of indecision and spiralling costs under successive Conservative governments, the new Labour Government is now moving decisively to resolve the future of the UK’s high-containment laboratory network. Mr Vince – who has raised the matter repeatedly with Ministers in meetings, correspondence, and on the floor of the House of Commons – has called the case for Harlow “overwhelming and urgent.”

“It’s taken Labour less than a year to get a grip on this. The Conservatives spent almost twelve years dithering, and all we got was delays, rising costs, and wasted money,” added Mr Vince. “Harlow is ready. It’s shovel-ready, costed, designed, and delivers value for money. Now it’s time to build.”

In a question to Health Minister Karin Smyth in Parliament last week (12 June 2025), Mr Vince advocated for Harlow’s case, saying:

“It has a business case, details, designs and a site ready to go, and the estimated timeframe has consistently been assessed as the best value for money and the quickest to deliver.”

The Minister responded:

“Honestly, no day goes past without him talking about this issue or, indeed, his new hospital. He is right, and he is a fantastic campaigner for the people of Harlow… he will be hearing from the Secretary of State soon on that issue.”

Why Harlow?

Ready to build: Harlow already has a fully worked-up Programme Business Case, detailed design, outline planning permission, and cost and risk estimates. It’s an empty, prepared site – construction could begin without further delay.

Faster and cheaper: The Harlow option is estimated at £3.2 billion, with completion in 2036. A comparable plan at Porton Down, by contrast, has not been developed beyond initial sketches.

Minimises risk: Porton Down is an operational site, making construction complex and disruptive. There is no clear plan for how existing labs would continue functioning during a rebuild. By contrast, Harlow offers a clean build with no such risk.

Protects public health: Current UKHSA high containment labs have a remaining lifespan of 14 years. Delaying until 2040 risks a gap between decommissioning old facilities and opening new ones – something Harlow avoids.

Economic boost: The Harlow site would bring a regeneration uplift worth an estimated £80 million a year to the local economy, creating hundreds of jobs and attracting wider investment.

Strategic location: Positioned in the London-Cambridge innovation corridor, home to over 600 life sciences businesses, including GSK and AstraZeneca, Harlow offers unparalleled access to research, partnerships, and talent. Its proximity to the MHRA further strengthens its case.

Scope for the future: The Harlow site can accommodate UKHSA HQ functions, releasing costly London office space, and allowing for future expansion. Porton Down cannot offer this.
“This isn’t just about Harlow,” said Mr Vince. “It’s about national resilience. It’s about being ready for the next pandemic, building modern labs in time, and using public money wisely. Harlow delivers on all counts.”

“We have a chance to finally move from delay and waste to action and delivery. Let’s build the future of UK health security, right here in Harlow.”

14 Comments for Chris Vince MP: It’s time to build the UKHSA’s new home in Harlow:

Stuart
2025-06-17 07:30:51

Thanks Chris - it would be really good to get this going and exactly the sort of high skilled jobs the town is crying out for.

Nigel Hughes
2025-06-17 07:32:24

I understood that the building itself would need to be demolished due to the fire safety system and fire regulations are so old it wouldn’t be a viable cost to adapt to the new regulations !

David Forman
2025-06-17 08:04:02

John Glen the MP for Salisbury gas repeatedly raised try this issue many times, but has used adjournment debates to further his cause. First elected to parliament in May 2010 he secured an adjournment debate within 7 weeks. Chris Vince has been an MP for 11 months and not secured a single adjournment debate to further Harlow's cause. Falling down on the job Mr Vince. This latest question to minister is too little, too late.

Seamus
2025-06-17 11:25:00

"“It’s taken Labour less than a year to get a grip on this.". “Harlow is ready. It’s shovel-ready, costed, designed, and delivers value for money. Now it’s time to build.”" I wonder if Mr Vince Is refering to a different building? When first discussed about moving to Harlow in 2021 it was costed at £530 million, the most recent estimate was £3.2 billion only a few years later and the project has been shelved. The UKHSA will not be coming to Harlow. Mr Vince also knows the highly qualified world leading staff were asked would they move with the UKHSA if it went to Harlow and almost all said no. This is one of those events Mr Vince knows it's not coming to Harlow so he is safe in making gestures and speeches that have no real expectation. Shovel ready? Mr Vince is definatly shovelling something.

Seamus
2025-06-17 14:12:59

One of the most obvious reasons it won't be built in Harlow is "Line of sight". Type Porton Down into your search engine and select the images or maps and then see the Porton Down facilities. They are surrounded by fences and vast area's of clear land to aid cameras, patrols, armed officers and dogs to ensure the safest protection for the site, it's staff and it's contents. Then look at the two artists impressions at the top of the article. No fencing, no clear land for best security practices and everyday public can be within feet of many of the buildings. The Harlow proposals in many parts, see the buildings reach within feet of public paths/roads. That site could never offer the security these labs need and that is why it will never come to Harlow on that plot.

DJBUK
2025-06-17 20:37:32

We need the New Hospital more that a research facility

Veg patch
2025-06-17 21:37:33

Where are the high skilled people coming from?. Not Harlow.

Guy Flegman
2025-06-18 06:58:36

When GSK owned the site the work they could carry out was restricted due to a basic risk assessment of the site. It is on a hill and so any potential dangerous research was not allowed. This was because if there was a major accident the site cannot be contained and any release would roll down the hill into the town. Porton Down is in a valley with underground facilities. That site was chosen as it passes the risk assessment. The harlow site does not. This means they can only move part of the operation to Harlow if it ever goes ahead, which I doubt will happen. In the mean time they will just hoover up lots of tax payers money to be spent without proper traceability

Adam
2025-06-18 09:56:29

Guy - I made a similar comment but my comment was deleted. perhaps because I questioned Chris's intelligence in pushing for this when it is just not in the correct location. Nor lets be honest would the staff want to move from the lovely English country side to the dump which is Harlow.

Mickeymouse
2025-06-18 13:30:39

Really who wants Harlow as new homes, hospital falling to bits, town full of druggies alcoholics....poor schools n houding. No incentive. Oxford, hospitals all local in Wiltshire.

Adrienne
2025-06-18 21:02:50

I am a laywomen and even I know that this site is a dead duck.Honestly Guy , you know how many times I have raised this issue.Infact I think I may have been the first one to bring it up. It beggars belief that the British government have little regard for the lives of their own electorates wishes.To put Harlow's people in danger. I am fed up repeatedly mentioning the fact. We all know what happened when Sars 19 apparently escaped from Wuhan Provence in China . This may or may not have been intentional .Perhaps we may have angered the Chinese Government heads . But I know one thing .It will not only put our lives in danger ,it will make the site a military target. To even suggest the idea is spiteful at the very least and a possible humanitarian wipeout at the worst. Do they really hate their constituents that much that they have no regard for their safety. I would like the opportunity personally to ask them myself but they're probably to chicken shit scared to interact with me. I am ashamed to be a Part of this country.I honestly believe that the do not care. A refitted Pah 1 and a new Pah 2 wouldn't cost that. Much .But they seem determined to leave Harlow at the wayside. It just shows that even though we voted them in,iff and only if they carry on with the same attitude they will not last till the end of the year. They will either have to seriously reform themselves or I will vote for Reform before they destroy this country and it's constantly deteriorating civil rights and abuse of the public safety.

Joan
2025-06-18 21:47:08

My guess is the decision is already leaning towards not going ahead with building in Harlow and this is just PR to soften the news when it arrives, along the lines of ‘look, we really campaigned and did everything’ but this was the decision. The reality might be that, if used properly, that space could have potential for proper economic development in the area, but only if the right decisions are made. If not, we’ll continue with the run down office space and no HSA either. A large tech and research cluster could be build there

Adrienne
2025-06-19 12:15:15

Or a temporary hospital while they rebuild PAH 1. Then it could be turned into a business hub. Or a hotel. That may put some money back. On the other hand unless we have county council status.Like was planned.The majority of the tax payers money doesn't stay in Harlow. Which is why in principle I agree with combining the council and county council(well I think that's what was planned). But I agree with the some of other writers.Why all the secrecy. Are we still not allowed to have some input .So ideas that are banded about may actually be helpful. I know there aren't as many skilled people about or are there. Please clarify,the situation as I feel that people are mistrustful of the lack of opened Is it too much today 2025 and all that people have been put through with COVID etc.To shine a little bit more light on the situation. It is really hacking alot of the intelligent people off. I for one love honesty.I think we need reassurance. Hugs x

Adrienne
2025-06-19 12:17:40

Also I am not a fan of best value I would rather buildings are constructed from engineering brick quality. That way they may last 50 or 60 years.

Leave a Comment Below:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *