Reform “broadly welcome” Conservative-run council budget
News / Fri 6th Mar 2026 at 04:22pm
WITH all three parties (Conservative, Labour and Reform) all voting in support of the council budget, we asked Harlow Reform for their reflections on the evening.
A spokesperson said: “We broadly welcome the budget for Harlow put before the Full Council Meeting on 5th March 2026 and voted in support of it accordingly.

Any budget which is appropriately costed and apportioned and that does not saddle the authority and therefore Harlow residents with further unmanageable debt in a time of profound economic difficulty for so many, must be welcomed.
We appreciate the diligent, behind-the-scenes work of council officers in producing a detailed document that sets the Council’s financial course for the forthcoming period and safeguards important and valued local assets such as Pet’s Corner, the paddling pools, Harlow Museum, The Playhouse and so on.
Regarding this Conservative led authority’s drive to redevelop Harlow town centre, we again support the principle as, for too long, Harlow has been in decline, a decline painfully obvious in the dilapidated form of town centre buildings and infrastructure.
However, we remain concerned at the rush to ‘demolish and rebuild everything-all-at-once’ approach which, by any rational analysis, cannot be regarded as a sound and financially responsible strategy. The spiking costs of construction and labour, and the potential impact of economic shocks which we have all had to become too often accustomed to in recent years, would hit not one project, but all of them. No one council can be far-sighted enough to infallibly hedge against such risks. The result could be that Harlow goes from a declining townscape to a semi-finished building site for many years. While we would of course hope otherwise, this could be the Conservative party’s legacy long after it has been ejected from the Council Chamber, much as has been the case when considering the state they left the economy in nationally, after 14 years of misrule.
A second concern is the lack of imagination to the town’s rebuild and understanding of modern retail trends. The town centre serves around 100,000 people and yet, over the years, has been unable to retain its flagship retail outlets and hospitality venues. The reality of so much retail now happening online must be recognised. It may be that our town centre retail zone should be smaller in footprint but higher in quality and developed as a desirable place for our residents to visit. After all, major shopping centres such as Lakeside and Bluewater are only 30 or so minutes away.
Stone Cross aka the market square, after so many false starts including astro-turfed play areas, bizarre giant plant pots and concrete table tennis tables, is earmarked by this Council as a hospitality zone. ‘Buy the buildings, tear them down and the bars and restaurants will come’ is the Council’s gamble. This ignores the fact that again habits have changed, the envisioned bar culture belongs to the 1990s and the fact that the planned arts quarter, which it is hoped many will visit, is at the town centre’s opposite end to the intended hospitality zone. A further self-defeating act by this council is the erosion of town centre parking at the Market Square end of town as a further disincentive to those who may not wish to cycle or take a bus to a town centre restaurant! More muddled thinking and overreach perhaps.
So while the investment in the town and the long overdue refurbishment of council property are grounds for cautious optimism, it is right to be concerned that the Conservatives have sought to reserve all of the big decision for themselves, even down to their cowardly and appalling attempt to cancel this May’s elections to shut down public opinion on their plans. The effect could be that their actions will saddle any future council, whatever its shape, form or colour, to the decisions and whims of this Conservative Council.
“One thing is for sure; that we ALL share an ambition for Harlow, that its decline is reversed, that it is restored to a place of pride and opportunity, particularly for its long-standing residents, and Reform Harlow are wholly committed to the sensible and measured achievement of that goal as we head towards the 7th May local elections”.
I don't think Reform do "broadly welcome" the budget. The problem they have, and labour, is what do they to have offer as an alternative to what our "local conservatives" are doing. One thing at a time perhaps which could add years on to the rebuilding, and more cars although the parking comment is probably valid. Labour recognised last night that presenting alternatives would not show them in a good light. The tories do seem like business people, I am not sure reform and labour do.
This letter clearly highlights that the Reform Group have no understanding of how a regeneration programme works or is managed. They also overlook that Harlow was short listed as the most improved Council in England. They also probably don't really know much about Harlow judging by the comments. I heard that their local Leader doesn't even live here. The regeneration in Harlow has been well planned over several years using innovative financing and acquisition negotiations alongside professional advisers, something clearly beyond the grasp of the author of this letter. The works being undertaken are clearly based on a plan and market research regarding future investors and retailers expressing interest in the town. I think both Labour and Reform will place this programme in jeopardy. Neither has the skill sets to complete such a project. Judging from the responses last night -from the YH video - of Labour and the total silence of Reform, it is obvious they can contribute nothing. As for the May elections, this is about the future of Harlow only. Let Dan Swords and his team finish the job that only they had the vision, courage and ability to start after decades of neglect and decline. Running a Council is much more than Reform supporting the hoisting of flags and Labour seeking to remove them. It is about improving the lives and prospects of our residents and businesses.
What experience do REFORM have with dealing with budgets , anywhere they have had to do with the purse strings , they have mispent the money or just stole it.
Reform are projected to win both Harlow district council and Essex county council in may, with the failed conservatives may even be reduced to just four seats on Essex county council. Both Labour and the tories will never be forgiven for betraying the British people time and time again
Reform are Tories, Tina. The best ones anyway. And that's why they get my vote. The ones that left the Conservatives are the ones we can trust.
I agree with Val's comments. It is clear that the Conservatives field a strong team, which on finance is headed by councillor James Leppard. Leppard is highly regarded in the finance sector and anyone who has taken the time to talk to him will realise he is diligent and thoughtful. Labour and Reform do not have anyone who can match the Tories. This Reform statement would have been useful to hear from councillor Jago on budget night, but he decided to remain silent. Reform could spend some of their substantial big business donations on public speaking lessons, but prefer to spend it on flashy stage sets and grand occasions just like fascist Oswald Mosley with his Olympia meeting.
@david foreman comparing reform uk to fascists. That is exactly the sort of mud-slinging i expect from a globalist badenoch supporter
Harlow Tina can you set out Reform's plans for Harlow? Not national issues, just local. It is not too much to ask. As has been mentioned with only 11 seats up for election, it is impossible for Reform to take control. So what are they going to do?
Your right Tina,Reform are not fascists. But they may well be racists
Let's stop all the name calling nonsense. The fact is that mathematically Reforn cannot win control of the Council. That is fact. Therefore, what is their plan for Harlow for the one year until the next elections for the new Shadow Council for the much larger unitary authority? Can Reform Harlow set out their specific plans. If not why should anybody vote for them in May? Come on, what are you going to do that is both better and different? Until then, it is best to stick with Dan Swords and his team. So far, Reform sound about as useless in Harlow as Labour.
Yvonne. I agree with you, but your final sentence is just as bad as name calling.
Yes Eddie. I take your point.
Harlow Tina you say labour and tories will never be forgiven. Fair enough. But some if these unforgivable tories are now leading lights in reform, Jenrik being the front runner. A bit of a quandry perhaps
Yvonne, you are wrong that Reform cannot win Harlow Council in May, 11 seats are up for grabs, if they win them all they will have 12 councillors including the existing one in Mark Hall. I hope this doesn't happen !
As Reform's supporters complained about reference to fascist Oswald Mosley's Olympia meeting I now include news reports of Reform's Birmingham rally March 2025 and the Olympia meeting in June 1934 to show the parallels. Open Democracy's report on Reform's Birmingham rally March 2025: "Reform boasted that 10,000 people were attending tonight’s “sold out” launch of their local election and mayoral campaign." ..."It’s time for Nigel Farage, entering the arena on a JCB Pothole Pro, lent for the event by the company’s chair Lord Bamford, a man perhaps best known for bankrolling Boris Johnson." Sky News reported the Birmingham rally thus: "In one of the biggest arenas in Birmingham, the production value was high." Mosley's Olympia rally June 1934 report by Guardian: "Sir Oswald Mosley provided close on 10,000 people in Olympia tonight with an entertainment which Mr. Bertram Mills might at once have envied and deplored." "...Inside the great hall it was seen that Sir Oswald Mosley had nothing of theatricalism to learn from either Hitler or Mussolini." See following links: https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/5050/undercover-in-reform-uk-rally-angry-white-men-nigel-farage-arron-banks/ https://www.theguardian.com/news/1934/jun/08/leadersandreply.mainsection
As Reform's supporters complained about reference to fascist Oswald Mosley's Olympia meeting I now include news reports of Reform's Birmingham rally March 2025 and the Olympia meeting in June 1934 to show the parallels. Open Democracy's report on Reform's Birmingham rally March 2025: "Reform boasted that 10,000 people were attending tonight’s “sold out” launch of their local election and mayoral campaign." ..."It’s time for Nigel Farage, entering the arena on a JCB Pothole Pro, lent for the event by the company’s chair Lord Bamford, a man perhaps best known for bankrolling Boris Johnson." Sky News reported the Birmingham rally thus: "In one of the biggest arenas in Birmingham, the production value was high." Mosley's Olympia rally June 1934 report by Guardian: "Sir Oswald Mosley provided close on 10,000 people in Olympia tonight with an entertainment which Mr. Bertram Mills might at once have envied and deplored." "...Inside the great hall it was seen that Sir Oswald Mosley had nothing of theatricalism to learn from either Hitler or Mussolini." See following links: https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/5050/undercover-in-reform-uk-rally-angry-white-men-nigel-farage-arron-banks/ https://www.theguardian.com/news/1934/jun/08/leadersandreply.mainsection
Steve, to control the Council, a party needs 17 seats. 17 of 33. Max Reform could win is 11 plus their existing 1 = 12. That is 5 short of control. As I pointed out, Reform cannot win control of the Council and neither can they appoint the Leader of the Council as this requires a majority vote by Full Council. Again, this would need 17 votes. Anything other than a Council run by Dan Swords will stall the regeneration programme to the disadvantage of Harlow.
My vote is for Dan the Man Swords and his team. The only ones capable of running our town. This election in May is only about Harlow. Let Dan finish the much needed regeneration. Neither Labour, Reform nor the Greens has the ability to do it.
Arithmetic of the chamber aside, the benefit of the Tories losing overall control is that it would allow for a viewpoint OTHER than Dan Swords', and to act as a check and balance on his agenda. That is a very long way short of Yvonne's laboured suggestion that momentum would stall...that is simply to parrot Cllr Swords' playbook. Consider the possibility that Dan Swords' rush to demolish and rebuild is indeed as hasty as it appears, and that the money runs out or appointed developers' go bust (it happens...look at Cheshunt's 'Sunshine Studios' if you need an example). Where does that leave Harlow? Rhetorical, because I can tell you...asking how on earth Cllr Swords was allowed to get away with it?! But none of it adds up to the unadultered nonsense of suggesting that Reform would seek to throw all forward progress under the bus.
David Forman - so many of your comments are worth a read as you appear to be well-researched and sometimes even-handed. Then you post things about Mosley and Olympia comparing it to a Reform rally in Birmingham. Later in the year will you be comparing Labour's autumn conference with China's two-sessions?? You do yourself a disservice with low-ball stuff like this.
Scott H, on the YH Budget video neither Labour nor Reform councillors made any substantive comments or proposals. In fact, the Reform said nothing at all and looked completely lost. Why should Harlow residents risk the whole regeneration programme to a bunch of unqualified amateurs? What alternative policies for Harlow is Reform proposing? The councils they control are a complete shambles with councillors resigning and taxes increasing. They are clueless. Harlow residents should not risk the regeneration ably led by Dan Swords . Too much is at stake for Harlow. I understand that the local Reform leader doesn't even live in Harlow! How serious is that? About as credible as Harlow Labour! Harlow needs to stick with Dan Swords and his team to finish the job. Labour and Reform offer nothing locally.
I thought all councillors had to live in Harlow. If what you say is true, how can the Reform leader be a candidate if he doesn't even live here? What can he know about our town? Sounds pretty suspicious to me.
It's quite simple really. Political branches are based on the Parliamentary seats. Harlow District is the smallest in the UK, so the Parliamentary seat includes villages such as Roydon, Nazeing, Sheering, Hastingwood and Hatfield Heath/Broad Oak. All villages with people who use Harlow facilities. Our Reform District candidates all live in Harlow. As for attacking Paul Jago, our very popular only Reform Councillor - how would you like to be a lone voice in 33? We in Reform will put a critical eye and provide a fresh look at everything. Who wouldn't like to see additional looks and all these programs and see if they can be made better still rather just be the vision of one 24 year old! Cllr. Swords is not even up for Election, so what is he actually getting at. Don't forget Ladies and Gentlemen that this is the same Dan Swords who didn't even want to give you a vote!!!
Mark Gough, clutching at straws springs to mind. Your councillor didn't utter a word on the Budget, the most important Council meeting of the year. Neither Labour nor Reform added anything, so they clearly support what Dan Swords and his team are doing. In fact they all voted in favour. Just tell us the following: 1. Does the Harlow Reform leader actually live in Harlow District and is he standing as a candidate in the forthcoming elections? 2. What are the specific proposals of Reform UK for Harlow? How are these different to those of the current administration? 3. What are the skill sets and experience of Reform's prospective candidates that are better than those of the current administration. As for Dan Swords comparative youth, he has proven he has drive, ambition and leadership qualities and most important, he is delivering. Do you truly think Reform could do better? Why would Harlow residents risk the entire Regeneration programme for a band of unknowns? The track record of Reform run councils to date is hardly inspiring! Even though I sympathise with much of Reform nationally, locally for Harlow, I am supporting Dan Swords who has a great track record.
As Julie says, Dan Swords has been a breath of fresh air for Harlow. Things are really improving. Whatever our views on the national situation, the May elections are only about Harlow, and although I wouldn't consider myself Conservative, my vote will go to Dan's side. Dan is the Man for Harlow. No one else comes close!
So are Reform proposing that we vote for candidates whose strings are being pulled by their non-elected local leader who doesn't live in Harlow? No thanks. I have been a Labour voter, but I recognise the positive work done by Dan Swords' led administration. He gets my vote in May.
Mark Gough, you really need to fact check. Harlow is not the smallest district council in the UK in terms of territory; both Stevenage ( a similar New Town) and Watford are smaller. Secondly, you mention how difficult it must be for your sole Reform councillor in a chamber with 32 other councillors; on the contrary, it should a great platform to stand out and trumpet Reform's proposals and plans for Harlow. Unfortunately, his abject silence is a strong indicator that Reform UK has nothing to offer Harlow locally.
27 Comments for Reform “broadly welcome” Conservative-run council budget: