Harlow MP Chris Vince welcomes the budget
Chris Vince / Wed 26th Nov 2025 at 03:05pm
THE Chancellor’s Budget supports Harlow families, strengthens services like the NHS and schools in Harlow, and puts our country’s finances on a stable footing.
Chris Vince welcomes the good news that the minimum wage will rise for millions of people, including thousands in Harlow. We are beating the forecasts with growth this year. Wages are up more in the first year of this Government than the first decade under the Conservatives.

In the Budget, the Chancellor confirmed the extension of the 5p cut in fuel duty until September next year, benefiting thousands of motorists across Harlow. Local drivers will also benefit from a new price-watching system, which will highlight the cheapest fuel in the area.
Highlighting her commitment to giving every child an equal chance, the Chancellor announced the fully funded removal of the two-child benefit limit, coming into effect in April. This reform is set to deliver the biggest reduction in child poverty in a single Parliament since records began. This is not a political point-scoring exercise – it is the duty of any Labour Government to lift children out of poverty.
Other key measures that will help Harlow include:
Support for households, including a freeze on rail fares, bus fares, and prescription charges.
Scrapping the Eco Energy scheme, reducing household energy bills by an average of £150 from April.
Investment in education and communities, including £5m for libraries in secondary schools, meaning every school in Harlow will have a library, and £18m to upgrade playgrounds nationwide.
Gambling tax reforms, raising Remote Gaming Duty from 21% to 40% and online betting duty from 15% to 25%, while abolishing Bingo Duty from April 2026. These changes are expected to raise over £1bn per year by 2031, tackling unfair practices in digital gambling and reducing harm to individuals and families.
New council tax surcharges for homes over £2m and £5m, expected to raise over £400m by 2031, ensuring high-value properties contribute their fair share.
The Budget also demonstrates strong government accountability, recovering nearly £400m from dodgy pandemic contracts, while outlining a clear plan to control borrowing and support investment. National debt will total £2.6tn this year, with one in every £10 spent on debt interest, but Labour’s fiscal rules will reduce borrowing and deliver a budget surplus of £3.9bn by 2028/29.
The Chancellor emphasised that this Budget delivers real benefits for families and communities just like Harlow, from cutting child poverty and household bills to investing in schools, libraries, and playgrounds, without resorting to austerity.
Of course he did this was a budget for those who sit on their ass contributing nothing, the parasite is killing the host. The markets are not going to like it either.
He would do the people who do the right thing get clobbered and the people scrounging off the state do all right.This country is a complete farce.
In a recent article on this platform I suggested waiting for the budget to assess the scope of investment in general and Harlow in particular. Now we have the results and although the financial markets have not exploded as in the case of Liz Truss, GDP performance is predicted to fall over the term of this government. That will affect investment plans for business and the public services. However, the removal of the two child benefit cap will help child poverty. I as a socialist support that entirely. My concerns are based around the standard of the MP's in this country who, unlike Attlee and Bevan, had policies that changed the country for the benefit of people. The current intake behave disgracefully and Ms Badenoch showed why she is unlikely to become the Prime Minister of this country. I also think that both Ms Reeves and Mr Starmer will be gone after the local elections next year. Anyone got a spare ticket to Vancouver?
It's a race to the bottom to get on benefits or leave the country, seen on another site but how true.
A much improved Budget than last year. I especially like scrapping the two child benefit cap. "The Institute for Fiscal studies has estimated that abolishing the cap could lift more than 600,000 children out of poverty across the UK at a cost of about £3.6bn a year." Source is BBC at https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c9wvwekx7j4o
Chris Vince is economically illiterate. Just look at the exodus of British entrepreneurs leaving the country. This Budget hits working people, savers, investors. These are the wealth creators. Instead we are replacing them with illegal migrants who are a burden on the state and the UK taxpayer. Growth is down, inflation is up and debt and debt servicing is up. This Budget is a disaster for working people and small businesses. Just for the leak, Reeves should resign. A Government with no direction and incompetent leadership.
In our day if you could only afford 2kids that what you had.tax payer paying for kids who parents can't be bothered to work
I suspect this more altruistic Budget by Rachel from Accounts is more due to the ever increasing popularity of the Green Party and realising that hammering the vulnerable last year went down like a bucket of sick.
Les, having worked with the unemployed I can assure you that most want to work and are not lazy. And those claiming benefit are in full time employment living on the minimum wage. However, if you know of anyone defrauding the system then report it to the benefit hotline. It is easy to find. I wonder how many do. Do you know the figures?
Val I can't imagine a dog with flleas complaining if a few jumped off of it. Thousands of people are complaining about the boat people entering the country, perhaps this can address their concerns. When the Tories took power in 2010 there was hardly any Billionaires now there are trillionaires in this world. If you earned 5 million pounds a day for 500 years you would still not be a trillionaire, that is how obscene this wealth is. Don't tell me it will trickle down because if it did they would not get richer and we would be better off. Over 80% of the world's wealth is owned by less than 10% of the people.
When I started work, many years ago, I was told to work hard and save hard for my retirement. I am lucky that, although I am disabled, I have a good job and a good company that supports me. But I am now being told, save for my pension, but if you save too much, you will have to pay more. Or if I decide to save away money in an ISA, I can now save a lot less tax free. I started my working life, in a minimum wage job, but these will slowly disappear as small businesses find it harder and harder to meet the ever increasing cost of employing someone fresh out of school or college. And if I decide to change my car, which I was considering next year, and moving to an electric car, to be good for the environment, then I will incur a £0.03/mile tax every time I drive. As my work is a 110 mile round trip, that is £3.30 a day direct tax for the privilege of going to work. Now yes arguably I could find a job closer to home, but it wouldn't pay as much as I earn now. How long before regional mayors start charging people for travelling through their areas "as a tourist". And all this behind the backdrop of inflation. "It will be a little bit lower", but that is still inflation, prices will still go up. I can't wait to see how they will handle the public sector pay requests that keep coming in. Will they reject them by saying "we must all do our bit"? Does anyone know if Angela Rayner has paid her underpaid Stamp Duty yet? And any associated interest charges and fines?
Gary Roberts - That might be the case for some, but to many these days do not and game the system. Look at the rise of the sickfluencer trend on ticktock etc which people show how to maximise / game the system. Those who truly need help should get it and better than what we do now, but you are not telling me that an increase of 1.8 Million between 2020 and 2025 is sustainable or in fact true. Too many are gaming the system, it is time it stopped.
Adam, if you know the figures that are playing the system can you tell me? And if you know someone who is doing it, could I suggest you do what I suggested and report them to the DWP on the benefit hotline.
Kemi Badenoch's final statement says it all, "This budget is about ahigher benefits paid by working people" clear evidence of divide and conquer.
Of course Chris Vince supports it. He's unlikely to do anything to risk his £93,904 plus expenses over something silly like representing the working people of Harlow. James, this budget was about appeasing Labour mp's more than the people of the U.K. so in that, Badenoch's comment remains quite accurate.
Gary Roberts why should hard working people with 1 or 2 kids pay for those who want to have 4 kids and can't afford them
What Les said. Why should people pay for someone else’s kids. If you can’t afford to have children then don’t have them,
Les because one day those kids will be paying for your pension. Seamus her comments were to ensure working people to blame the poor and needy.
James gamble what pension got to work till 68 to pay for all those kids
Those kids won't pay for our pensions as they will be benefit bums like their parents. Most working families can not afford more than 1or 2 children and still struggle on decent incomes. There is no good in this budget for anyone even pensioners, esp for small businesses so more job losses and claims. Any1 with money will leave the country
Chris Vince nominated for the title of Plonker Extraordinaire. A complete waste of space and an embarrassment to this constituency.
When small businesses have to let people go , the goverment will have to pay them benefits, so no one wins. Also my attitude towards having more than 2 children is , if you want more you pay for them, why should I.
Millions of people are about to loose their jobs to high tech, and they will never work again because the tech now advances faster than we can retrain, and the government’s solution is to make those still in work pay for the benefits that will be required. This is flawed because as the working population shrinks the burden will become unsustainable. What they should be doing is taxing the tech companies more as they pay very little tax here even though we are a large part of the market. This of course won’t happen as big tech now controls the world more than governments. Minions like us will just be left behind to eat each other.
What planet is Chris Vince on. The freezing of the tax thresholds is a tax rise that affects millions (Even those receiving the much trumpeted rise in the minimum wage), pensioners with modest private pensions penalised if they receive a small increase. Rachael Reeves used the excuse that the Tories brought it in so its their fault she hasn't removed it but is extending for 3 extra years. Funny the Tories brought in the 2 child cap but to appease the welfare state crazy back benchers thats gone. The news reported today that there 18000 families with 6 children that will now get an extra £14000 a year in benefits (No point bothering getting up to go work). If you can't afford 6 kids don't have them. Free breakfast clubs, Free school meals, Free child care, 2 child cap lift. Nothing is Free its the taxpayer who picks up the tab. If the government want our NHS in Harlow to be strengthed they could deliver on the new promised Hospital
So children are to blame because some people can't save for their old age. The Tories want you to turn against each other so they can control you. First it's boat people now it's children and parents, who next pets or maybe the disabled. All the time the rich get richer by avoiding paying there taxes.
Yes Jim . And it's your Labour party that's not upping their taxes. Labour need the extra taxes to pay the greedy unions.
2022-2023 the tax burden was approx £17000 for every man woman and child in the uk. So it could be argued that anybody paying less than this in tax is not paying their fair share if you believe in everybody should pay their fair share
This country is already over populated and needing swathes of land to be buried under housing just to cope. Giving more money for additional offspring is pure madness, not only for us tax payers but also for what's left of our green and somewhat unpleasant land. We should be like how China used to be and enforce a limit on how many children we are allowed to have. As for the rest of the budget, it's a money grab by stealth as usual :(
Guy - the average tax contribution in Harlow per person is about £7K the town is full of people who do not pay their fair share but demand others should.
Ted first of all this is not my Labour Party. Next Trade Unions fight for it's members not their self, so how can they be greedy? By some of the comments on here they want all men to have a vasectomy and women be sterilised after having two children. The average birth rate in 2022 23 in England and Wales was 1.44 so what is the problem?
Vince the freeze on the tax thresholds will become a big problem when State Pensions rise above the £12,570 threshold, which will undoubtedly happen in April 2027. Surely this level should be set at the standard pension level each year.
It is very simple to understand James unless someone has drunk the Labour kool aid. If I work, save, plan for the future and want three holidays a year but can only afford two holidays a year, I don't go running to the government asking to fund my third or more holidays. The official figures say that Brits are having less and less kids, some having no kids at all. So just who will benefit from "have as many kids as you like and the tax payer will pick up the tab"?. That is the simple economics of what labour has just done. . Starmer also said during the election that he would not bring the two child cap removal as it was unafordable but now apparently it is. Your pensioner comment, it's happening now. My dad took government advice, worked till he was 70 to ensure he would get the best state pension they offered. Earlier this year he got a tax bill in the hundreds because they are already having money taken away from pensioners by freezing the tax threshold. They have broken pretty much most of their pledges and gone after the working class, small and medium business owners, farmers and pensioners whilst unemployment has gone up for every single month they have been in power. She/they have created a country where working, saving, planning etc doesn't pay and you can guarranty at next years budget, she will do it all again as there is no promise they will not break pledges and manifesto's again and there is no tax payer they won't go after.
Firstly Seamus, you do not pay tax on NI contributions so you have to pay tax on your state pension. I do not understand why you father was advised to work till he was 70 and not claim his State pension as he could have done both. Finally the Tax threshold was frozen until 2028 by the Tories when they were in power, this Labour Government has extended that another 3 years. Also the Labour manifesto did not promise to release the freeze on the tax thresholds, it said working tax rates would not rise and they have not.
And it's not your Labour.!!!
I am not a member of the Labour Party Ted. I think anything is better than the last Government. I do not think children should suffer because of their parents. In any case if as you say parents are having children for the money as a father of three I do not envy them it is hard work.
James, Seamus father probably didn’t have enough Nl contributions to be granted a full pension, so was advised to keep working and paying NI contributions until he achieved the required amount.
Thank you Stuart. If that is the case unless his father get more than the standard pension which is £921 every four weeks he would not be taxed on his pension. Of course as he is claiming later he would get an increased pension. Unless he was fully informed of this he could have a case against the person/persons who advised him.
Of course he would as benifit arse sitters vote labour as free money
Chris Vince will be a 1 term MP for Harlow #fact
Surely this paper should not allow the use of foul language as in anonymous has used.
It is all wrong and that is half the battle of the welfare state, these irresponsible men and women making babies, knowing full well they will never contribute anything to fund their lifestyle choice and expect the tax payers to pay for their children. The Labour Party just encourages yet more of these feckless parasites!
A lot of children in poverty have working parent(s). Sadly not everyone can be a CEO of a bank who can afford nursey or care fees in order to work or keep up with the huge rises in the cost of living. Many families are now struggling. Sure, people should have children they can afford, but it doesn't take much to change everything - divorce, illness, losing a well paid job and then families get snowed under. It isn't the children's fault and they should not be in poverty through the choice of their parents, they did not have a say in their being born. Until there is a foolproof way of telling apart the chancers from the genuine in need then we have to help all. One genuine person suffering is one too many.
If I were a bit younger I'd be out of this country pronto,I feel sorry for youngsters these days they have my full sympathy.
Fed up where would you go?
What is the difference between Chris Vince and your regular imbecile? Well, your regular imbecile is unlikely to cost Circa £400,000 p.a in salary, allowances and expenses. Simple question, would you pay £ 400k p.a. for Chris Vince, because that is what you are paying!
45 Comments for Harlow MP Chris Vince welcomes the budget: