XII I II III IIII V VI VII VIII IX X XI

Letter to the Editor: Answers to Harlow’s housing problem

News / Thu 29th Aug 2019 at 06:55am

Letter to the Editor

TWO reports on the subject of housing were published last week which make interesting reading and ones which politicians both nationally and locally should take note of.

The first, from The Tony Blair Institute for Global Change states that the housing crisis is not caused by a lack of supply and that meeting the Governments target of 300,000 new homes a year will not make a significant inpact on house prices and rents. It went on to say that meeting this target would only cut house prices by 10% over a 20 year period and that the supply shortage story was a “red herring”. The low mortgage interest rates and global economics, including international demand to buy up property in London are behind the 160% rise in real-terms house prices since 1996. Increasing housing supply is likely to lead to a rise in the number of empty homes rather than boost levels of home ownership. It’s conclusion was that politicians should focus on reversing the erosion of social housing stock, ending housing benefit cuts and improving wage growth for young people to tackle affordability problems in the rented sector.

The second report comes from the National Housing Federation who analysed government data which found that 1.3 million children from more than 600,000 families are stuck in overcrowded living conditions of which one in four children have to share a bed with a parent or sibling. Kate Henderson the COE said that the only way to fix the problem is to build enough social housing, which requires a radical public spending programme- there is simply no other way.

One of The Harlow Alliance Party’s objection to the Local Plan of Epping Forest District and the homes proposed for the North of Harlow is the lost opportunity to include homes owned by local councils. With a limited supply of suitable land to build on, Harlow Council must make best use of it’s existing housing stock and one way to do this is to build as many bungalows as possible for older tenants and those with physical impairment so that many of the hundreds of underoccupied homes can be vacated and let to young families who are presently overcrowded. As things stand, if both of the above reports prove to be correct, in 2031 when all these thousands of privately owned homes are built on Harlow’s borders, there will still be thousands of families on the Council’s Housing Register and people living in tents and other unsuitable accommodation.

Regards

Nicholas Taylor

4 Comments for Letter to the Editor: Answers to Harlow’s housing problem:

kthe5
2019-08-30 17:14:34

Building bungalows as a more efficient land use is counter-intuitive - *initially*. Building bungalows to free up under-occupied houses is a very interesting idea. How many houses are there in Harlow that are under-occupied that could be freed up? How many bungalows would be required to free up all these houses? (I somehow expect it isn't a 1:1 ratio for some reason.) Also, would it require a bungalow in every case? Recently there have been a number of applications to redevelop buildings in the town centre. What would it take for, say, the lower floors of some of these new developments to be allocated to free up some of the under-occupied houses? I expect some people might like living close to the amenities instead of a bungalow in a new garden town. Being brown-field deveopments they would be preferable to green-field developments.

durcant
2019-08-30 17:45:04

Whilst retirement bungalows are an option is not the solution. Some people like retirement villages but I still prefer the Gibberd principle that ever Estate should be accessible and affordable to enable all sectors of the community to live work and enjoy themselves in safety and harmony. Bringing different generation together is better for all. It should provide safety and unity enabling the young to live and respect living near more elderly people. Equally for the more mature to enjoy being part of the future growth of our community. Moving people with a disability to a retirement village isn’t the answer either. We should commit to a community fit for all with local access and amenities. Let’s not isolate but instead value the massive and positive contribution that everyone can bring regardless of age, gender or disability.

tenpin
2019-08-31 17:08:50

You know quite well Durcant that the Gibberd principle is just what the Harlow Alliance Party are advocating. If and when Harlow Council decide to build on some of Harlow's open spaces (which are often in or between estates) then they should be building bungalows, so that residents living in them feel part of the community they have lived in for many years, whilst at the same time vacating a home they were allocated when they needed a home for their families, one which can now be re-occupied by a young family.

tenpin
2019-09-02 12:51:14

kthe5, I can tell you that a Freedom of Information request made by the Harlow Alliance Party to Harlow Council revealed that more than 1500 homes in Council Tax Band D and above (generally larger houses) are occupied by just ONE persoN. Harlow Council's Local Plan for the next 12 years or so indicates that about 450 new homes could be built on it's land and another 600 or more in private ownership (where it must be said that with present policies none will be bungalows). Building say 400 bungalows would free up 400 of the towns larger council houses which in turn would free up a further 800 homes as families "move up" the housing chain. There are numerous examples around the country where new flat blocks are built to provide public space for either families (play areas, child care etc) or older residents (for social events) and Harlow Council should look very carefully at Planning Application for new flats in the Town Centre to ensure that public spaces are provided within the development.

Leave a Comment Below:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *